Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;32(9):1629-1637.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01559-3. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Approaches to the diagnosis and prevention of frailty

Affiliations
Review

Approaches to the diagnosis and prevention of frailty

S J Woolford et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

An individual who is living with frailty has impairments in homeostasis across several body systems and is more vulnerable to stressors that may ultimately predispose them to negative health-related outcomes, disability and increased healthcare use. Approximately a quarter of individuals aged > 85 years are living with frailty and as such the identification of those who are frail is a public health priority. Given that the syndrome of frailty is defined by progressive and gradual loss of physiological reserves there is much scope to attempt to modify the trajectory of the frailty syndrome via physical activity and nutritional interventions. In this review we give an up to date account on the identification of frailty in clinical practice and offer insights into physical activity and nutritional strategies that may be beneficial to modify or reverse the frailty syndrome.

Keywords: Frailty; Identifying frailty; Nutrition; Physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Determinants and development of frailty. The ideal healthy ageing paradigm, free of illness and physiological vulnerability, is represented by the thick line (blue). Frailty, represented by the thin line (red), develops as a continuum from a state of being physiologically robust and independent to being at risk of disability and dependency and, ultimately, to being hospitalised institutionalised or at risk of dying. In younger robust individuals (a) rapid recovery after an injury or illness that leads to reduced functional capacity is more likely. Later in the life course, cumulative physiological decline across multiple body systems leads to episodic functional, psychological or cognitive decompensation. At this stage, recovery after these stressor events takes longer as physiological and cognitive reserves are depleted. Eventually, a transition point in later life is crossed when the individual cannot compensate adequately and the ability to perform daily activity diminishes. This increases the likelihood of disability, healthcare service use or hospitalisation as a consequence of a relatively minor stresses or insults. Ultimately, the accumulation of these homeostatic insults results in further disability, healthcare dependency, recurrent hospitalisation, institutionalisation and risk of dying (b). Adapted from Patel et al.

References

    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–762. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Physical frailty: ICFSR International clinical practice guidelines for identification and management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23:771–787. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, et al. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1487–1492. - PubMed
    1. Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, et al. Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) international consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17:726–734. - PubMed
    1. Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, et al. The predictive validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: disability, health care utilization, and quality of life in a population at risk. Gerontologist. 2012;52:619–631. - PubMed