Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 1;49(4):1326-1337.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa066.

Dicamba use and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study: an updated analysis

Catherine C Lerro  1 , Jonathan N Hofmann  1 , Gabriella Andreotti  1 , Stella Koutros  1 , Christine G Parks  2 , Aaron Blair  1 , Paul S Albert  3 , Jay H Lubin  3 , Dale P Sandler  2 , Laura E Beane Freeman  1
Affiliations

Dicamba use and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study: an updated analysis

Catherine C Lerro et al. Int J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: The herbicide dicamba has been commonly used agriculturally and residentially. Recent approval of genetically engineered dicamba-resistant crops is expected to lead to increased dicamba use, and there has been growing interest in potential human health effects. A prior analysis in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) suggested associations between dicamba and colon and lung cancer. We re-evaluated dicamba use in the AHS, including an additional 12 years and 2702 exposed cancers.

Methods: The AHS is a prospective cohort of pesticide applicators in Iowa and North Carolina. At enrollment (1993-1997) and follow-up (1999-2005), participants reported dicamba use. Exposure was characterized by cumulative intensity-weighted lifetime days, including exposure lags of up to 20 years. We estimated relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using multivariable Poisson regression for incident cancers diagnosed from enrollment through 2014/2015.

Results: Among 49 922 applicators, 26 412 (52.9%) used dicamba. Compared with applicators reporting no dicamba use, those in the highest quartile of exposure had elevated risk of liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer (nexposed = 28, RRQ4 = 1.80, CI: 1.26-2.56, Ptrend < 0.001) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL, nexposed = 93, RRQ4 = 1.20, CI: 0.96-1.50, Ptrend = 0.01) and decreased risk of myeloid leukaemia (nexposed = 55, RRQ4 = 0.73, CI: 0.51-1.03, Ptrend = 0.01). The associations for liver cancer and myeloid leukaemia remained after lagging exposure of up to 20 years.

Conclusions: With additional follow-up and exposure information, associations with lung and colon cancer were no longer apparent. In this first evaluation of liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer, there was an association with increasing use of dicamba that persisted across lags of up to 20 years.

Keywords: Dicamba; agricultural health study; agriculture; cancer; pesticides.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. US Environmental Protection Agency. Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Dicamba and Associated Salts. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2006.
    1. Atwood D, Paisley-Jones C. Pesticide Industry Sales and Usage: 2008–2012 Market Estimates. Washington, DC: Office of Pesticide Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2017.
    1. Behrens R, Lueschen WE. Dicamba volatility. Weed Sci 1979;27:486–93.
    1. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Pesticide Residues in Food 2010: Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues. Rome: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010.
    1. Samanic C, Rusiecki J, Dosemeci M et al. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to dicamba in the agricultural health study. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:1521–526. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types