Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 1;91(4):041101.
doi: 10.1063/5.0003320.

Single-photon sources: Approaching the ideal through multiplexing

Affiliations

Single-photon sources: Approaching the ideal through multiplexing

Evan Meyer-Scott et al. Rev Sci Instrum. .

Abstract

We review the rapid recent progress in single-photon sources based on multiplexing multiple probabilistic photon-creation events. Such multiplexing allows higher single-photon probabilities and lower contamination from higher-order photon states. We study the requirements for multiplexed sources and compare various approaches to multiplexing using different degrees of freedom.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Types of single-photon sources: (a) isolated quantum systems (e.g. a single particle in an optical cavity, with ground g and excited e states), (b) heralded single-photon sources from photon pairs, (c) multiplexed source (as one example, spatial multiplexing is shown).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Experimental source multiplexing (MUX) performance for state-of-the-art single-photon parametric down-conversion (PDC) sources. For comparison quantum dot performance is also shown. Left: The heralded fidelity to a single photon versus the brightness (i.e. the probability of finding just one photon per pump laser pulse). Single-source PDC brightness is bounded by the black line and limited to the grey region. Optimal sources are toward the upper right, and PDC source multiplexing has outperformed the best quantum dots in brightness. Right: The heralded g(2)(0) (= 0 for ideal single photons) versus the heralding probability. For standard PDC, g(2)(0) is bounded by the black line and limited to the grey region. Currently only bulk time multiplexing and quantum dots have achieved g(2)(0) better than this limit.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(upper) Heralding probability and heralded fidelity for a multiplexed single-photon source with K = 20 (solid) and K = 50 (dashed) sources, versus the efficiency of the heralding detector ηh for two different squeezing strengths λ. (lower) The fidelity is independent of the number of sources, while the heralding probability increases with source number.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Proposal for spatial source multiplexing, either using many distinct sources (a) or many spatial modes of a single source (b). Reprinted figure with permission from ref. . Copyright (2002) by the American Physical Society.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
(a) Schematic for temporal multiplexing using a storage loop, where many temporal modes are pumped, and the one with a herald event is synchronized using a selectable number of roundtrips of the storage loop to the output. Reprinted figure with permission from ref. . Copyright (2002) by the American Physical Society. (b) An alternative synchronization method, binary division, where the photon takes the single path with the correct delay length through the fiber network. Reprinted under Creative Commons Attribution license 3.0 from ref. .
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Spectral source multiplexing. The idler photon, which shares a correlated joint spectrum with the signal photon, is detected with spectral resolution (νi+, νi0, or νi), then the corresponding signal photon’s frequency is shifted to the output spectral band νs0. Reprinted figure with permission from ref. . Copyright (2017) by the American Physical Society.

References

    1. Klyshko DN, “Coherent photon decay in a nonlinear medium,” Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 6, 23 (1967).
    1. Kimble HJ, Dagenais M, and Mandel L, “Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett 39, 691–695 (1977).
    1. Giustina M, Versteegh MAM, Wengerowsky S, Handsteiner J, Hochrainer A, Phelan K, Steinlechner F, Kofler J, Larsson J-A, Abellán C, Amaya W, Pruneri V, Mitchell MW, Beyer J, Gerrits T, Lita AE, Shalm LK, Nam SW, Scheidl T, Ursin R, Wittmann B, and Zeilinger A, “Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett 115, 250401 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Shalm LK, Meyer-Scott E, Christensen BG, Bierhorst P, Wayne MA, Stevens MJ, Gerrits T, Glancy S, Hamel DR, Allman MS, Coakley KJ, Dyer SD, Hodge C, Lita AE, Verma VB, Lambrocco C, Tortorici E, Migdall AL, Zhang Y, Kumor DR, Farr WH, Marsili F, Shaw MD, Stern JA, Abellán C, Amaya W, Pruneri V, Jennewein T, Mitchell MW, Kwiat PG, Bienfang JC, Mirin RP, Knill E, and Nam SW, “Strong loophole-free test of local realism,” Phys. Rev. Lett 115, 250402 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giovannetti V, Lloyd S, and Maccone L, “Advances in quantum metrology,” Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011).