Overcoming the bottleneck to widespread testing: a rapid review of nucleic acid testing approaches for COVID-19 detection
- PMID: 32358057
- PMCID: PMC7297120
- DOI: 10.1261/rna.076232.120
Overcoming the bottleneck to widespread testing: a rapid review of nucleic acid testing approaches for COVID-19 detection
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic presents a serious public health crisis, and a better understanding of the scope and spread of the virus would be aided by more widespread testing. Nucleic-acid-based tests currently offer the most sensitive and early detection of COVID-19. However, the "gold standard" test pioneered by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention takes several hours to complete and requires extensive human labor, materials such as RNA extraction kits that could become in short supply, and relatively scarce qPCR machines. It is clear that a huge effort needs to be made to scale up current COVID-19 testing by orders of magnitude. There is thus a pressing need to evaluate alternative protocols, reagents, and approaches to allow nucleic-acid testing to continue in the face of these potential shortages. There has been a tremendous explosion in the number of papers written within the first weeks of the pandemic evaluating potential advances, comparable reagents, and alternatives to the "gold-standard" CDC RT-PCR test. Here we present a collection of these recent advances in COVID-19 nucleic acid testing, including both peer-reviewed and preprint articles. Due to the rapid developments during this crisis, we have included as many publications as possible, but many of the cited sources have not yet been peer-reviewed, so we urge researchers to further validate results in their own laboratories. We hope that this review can urgently consolidate and disseminate information to aid researchers in designing and implementing optimized COVID-19 testing protocols to increase the availability, accuracy, and speed of widespread COVID-19 testing.
Keywords: CRISPR; LAMP; RT-PCR; covid-19; sars-cov-2.
© 2020 Esbin et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.
Figures








References
-
- Abbott. 2020. ID NOWTM COVID-19 . ID NOWTM COVID-19 Prod Inser. https://www.alere.com/en/home/product-details/id-now-covid-19.html [accessed April 23, 2020].
-
- Aitken J, Ambrose K, Barrell S, Beale R, Bineva-Todd G, Biswas D, Byrne R, Caidan S, Cherepanov P, Churchward L, et al. 2020. Scalable and resilient SARS-CoV2 testing in an academic centre. medRxiv 10.1101/2020.04.19.20071373. - DOI
-
- Akst J. 2020. RNA extraction kits for COVID-19 tests are in short supply in US. The Scientist Magazine. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/rna-extraction-kits-for-covid... [accessed April 23, 2020].
-
- Alcoba-Florez J, Gonzalez-Montelongo R, Inigo-Campos A, de Artola DGM, Gil-Campesino H, Team TMTS, Ciuffreda L, Valenzuela-Fernandez A, Flores C. 2020. Fast SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR in preheated nasopharyngeal swab samples. medRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.04.08.20058495. - DOI
-
- Arumugam A, Wong SS. 2020. The potential use of unprocessed sample for RT-qPCR detection of COVID-19 without an RNA extraction step. bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.04.06.028811 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous