Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):96-103.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against recent clinical bacterial isolates from Brazil - the EM200 study

Affiliations

Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against recent clinical bacterial isolates from Brazil - the EM200 study

Felipe Francisco Tuon et al. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Background: The emergence of antibiotic resistance is increasing and there are few effective antibiotics to treat infections caused by resistant and multidrug resistant bacterial pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against clinical bacterial isolates from Brazil.

Methods: A total of 673 Gram-negative bacterial isolates including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Enterobacterales collected from 2016 to 2017 were tested, most of them isolated from patients in intensive care units. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC50/90) were determined by broth microdilution for amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam using dried panels. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria.

Results: Susceptibility rates to ceftolozane-tazobactam ranged from 40.4% to 94.9%. P. aeruginosa susceptibility rate to ceftolozane-tazobactam was 84.9% (MIC50/90, 1/16μg/mL) and 99.2% to colistin. For E. coli, ceftolozane-tazobactam inhibited 94.9% (MIC50/90, 0.25/1μg/mL) of the microorganisms. The susceptibility rate of K. pneumoniae to ceftolozane-tazobactam was 40.4% (MIC50/90, 16/>32μg/mL). Other Enterobacterales have shown susceptibility rates of 81.1% (MIC50/90, 0.5/16μg/mL) to ceftolozane-tazobactam, 93.9% to meropenem, 90.9% to amikacin (90.9%), and 88.6% to ertapenem. In non-carbapenemase producing isolates, AmpC mutations were found three isolates.

Conclusions: Ceftolozane-tazobactam has shown relevant activity against a large variety of the analyzed microorganisms collected from multiple centers in Brazil, showing promising results even in multidrug resistant strains.

Keywords: Antimicrobial Resistance; Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test; Ceftolozane; Drug Resistance; Enterobacterales; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; tazobactam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequency distribution (n) of ceftolozane–tazobactam at each MIC (μg/mL) for 132 Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Brazil.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency distribution (n) of ceftolozane–tazobactam at each MIC (μg/mL) for 216 Escherichia coli from Brazil.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency distribution (n) of ceftolozane–tazobactam at each MIC (μg/mL) for 193 Klebsiella pneumoniae from Brazil.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Frequency distribution (n) of ceftolozane–tazobactam at each MIC (μg/mL) for 132 other* Enterobacterales from Brazil. * Other Enterobacterales consist of (n): Klebsiella aerogenes (3); E. asburiae (1); E. cloacae (38); Klebsiella oxytoca (11); K. variicola (4); Morganella morganii (1); Proteus mirabilis (72); P. vulgaris (1); Providencia rettgeri (1).

References

    1. Bassetti M., Russo A., Carnelutti A., La Rosa A., Righi E. Antimicrobial resistance and treatment: an unmet clinical safety need. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018;17:669–680. - PubMed
    1. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About antimicrobial resistance. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/about.html
    1. Mehrad B., Clark N.M., Zhanel G.G., Lynch J.P. Antimicrobial resistance in hospital-acquired gram-negative bacterial infections. Chest. 2015;147:1413–1421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tamma P.D., Miller M.A., Cosgrove S.E. Rethinking how antibiotics are prescribed. JAMA. 2018;321:2018–2019. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) 2017. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics; p. 7.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources