Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;14(6):2692-2707.
doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00220-6.

Dynamic network connectivity predicts subjective cognitive decline: the Sino-Longitudinal Cognitive impairment and dementia study

Affiliations

Dynamic network connectivity predicts subjective cognitive decline: the Sino-Longitudinal Cognitive impairment and dementia study

Guozhao Dong et al. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disease in the elderly. We collected resting-state functional MRI data and applied novel graph-theoretical analyses to investigate the dynamic spatiotemporal cerebral connectivities in 63 individuals with SCD and 67 normal controls (NC). Temporal flexibility and spatiotemporal diversity were mapped to reflect dynamic time-varying functional interactions among the brain regions within and outside communities. Temporal flexibility indicates how frequently a brain region interacts with regions of other communities across time; spatiotemporal diversity describes how evenly a brain region interacts with regions belonging to other communities. SCD and NC differed in large-scale brain dynamics characterized by the two measures, which, with support vector machine, demonstrated higher classification accuracies than conventional static parameters and structural metrics. The findings characterize dynamic network dysfunction that may serve as a biomarker of the preclinical stage of AD.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Resting-state functional MRI; Spatiotemporal diversity; Subjective cognitive decline; Temporal flexibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of financial interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The computation of dynamic graph theoretic parameters. A sliding window approach was used to quantify the time-varying changes in the community structure of intrinsic functional connectivity. The temporal co-occurrence matrix was based on the Louvain community detection algorithm. The temporal flexibility and spatiotemporal diversity were computed by an optimized community detection algorithm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Algorithms for group classification. We used parameters of dynamic graph theory, static graph theory and gray matter volume as the features of SVM classifier, respectively. The Lasso sparse formula was used for feature selection. Ten-fold cross validation was used to obtain the accuracy of the classifier. We adjusted the penalty term parameters of the Lasso sparse formula based on the accuracy to obtain the optimal classification accuracy for each feature
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of neural features. The two dynamic connectivity measures showed the highest prediction accuracy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Top 10 regions with the largest weight of dynamic graph theoretic features. a Regions in red/blue each showed higher/lower mean temporal flexibility in SCD than in NC. b Bar plots of mean value of temporal flexibility of the top 10 brain regions, *** for P < 0.001; two sample t test. c Regions in red/blue each showed higher/lower mean spatiotemporal diversity in SCD than in NC. d Bar plots of mean value of spatiotemporal diversity of the top 10 brain regions, * for P < 0.05, ** for P < 0.01, *** for P < 0.001; two sample t test
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Behavioral correlation with dynamic graph theoretic parameters (FDR corrected, P < 0.05) across NC and SCD. NC: normal controls; SCD: subjective cognitive decline. AFT: animal fluency test; BNT: Boston naming test; AVLT: auditory verbal learning test

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen EA, Damaraju E, Plis SM, Erhardt EB, Eichele T, & Calhoun VD (2014). Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 663–676. 10.1093/cercor/bhs352. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashburner J, & Friston KJ (1999). Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Human Brain Mapping, 7(4), 254–266. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:43.3.CO;2-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barulli D, & Stern Y (2013). Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: Emerging concepts in cognitive reserve. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 502–509. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bassett DS, Wymbs NF, Porter MA, Mucha PJ, Carlson JM, & Grafton ST (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(18), 7641–7646. 10.1073/pnas.1018985108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bassett DS, Wymbs NF, Rombach MP, Porter MA, Mucha PJ, & Grafton ST (2013). Task-based core-periphery organization of human brain dynamics. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(9), e1003171 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003171. - DOI - PMC - PubMed