Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types?
- PMID: 32363450
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03217-9
Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types?
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether stone dust can be obtained from all prevailing stone composition types using the thulium fiber laser (TFL) for lithotripsy. Where applicable, stone dust was further characterized by morpho-constitutional analysis.
Methods: Human urinary stones were submitted to in vitro lithotripsy using a FiberLase U2 TFL generator with 150 µm silica core fibers (IPG Photonics®, IPG Medical™, Marlborough, MA, USA). Laser settings were 0.05 J, 320 Hz and 200 μs. A total of 2400 J were delivered to each stone composition type. All evaluated stones had a > 90% degree of purity (calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, uric acid, carbapatite, struvite, brushite and cystine). Spontaneously floating stone particles were considered as stone dust and collected for analysis by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Results: Stone dust could be retrieved from all evaluated urinary stones after TFL lithotripsy. Most stone dust samples revealed changes in crystalline organization, except for calcium oxalate monohydrate and carbapatite, which conserved their initial characteristics. Mean maximal width of stone dust particles did not exceed 254 µm.
Conclusions: The TFL is capable to produce stone dust from all prevailing stone types. Morpho-constitutional changes found in stone dust suggest a photothermal interaction of laser energy with the stone matrix during TFL lithotripsy.
Keywords: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; Lithotripsy; Scanning electron microscopy; Stone dust; Thulium fiber laser; Urolithiasis.
Comment in
-
Re: Thulium Fiber Laser: Ready to Dust All Urinary Stone Composition Types?Eur Urol. 2020 Dec;78(6):926. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Sep 6. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32900555 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann KU, Alken P (2000) Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs 2000. Eur Urol 44(6):709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00415-9 - DOI
-
- Raheem OA, Khandwala YS, Sur RL, Ghani KR, Denstedt JD (2017) Burden of urolithiasis: trends in prevalence, treatments, and costs. Eur Urol Focus 3(1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK (2017) Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol 31(6):547–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0895 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Doizi S, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O (2018) Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean? Nat Rev Urol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0042-9 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
