Psychology Today: Still in Denial, Still Outdated
- PMID: 32363525
- DOI: 10.1007/s12124-020-09534-3
Psychology Today: Still in Denial, Still Outdated
Abstract
The questionable state of psychology as a science has been pointed out repeatedly over last hundred years. Sometimes programs to overcome the obvious limitations of psychology have been also proposed. So far, in vain. Zagaria with coauthors (this issue) bring the subject up again. They demonstrate that psychology today is characterized by the incoherence of definitions of core constructs and lack of consensus in the scientific community. The authors also suggest that psychology would do better by adopting a research program of a specific form of evolutionary psychology. In this paper I show, mostly on the basis of my earlier works on the same subject, that shortcomings of psychology today go much deeper than the authors of the target article have discussed. Psychology today is characterized by fundamental epistemological and methodological problems. As the same shortcomings characterize the version of evolutionary psychology advocated by Zagaria and coauthors, it is not the best candidate to ground the future of psychology. I suggest the psychology misses unifying psychology of a specific kind, which basic principles were outlined by Vygotsky almost a century ago.
Keywords: Epistemology; Methodology; Paradigm; Psychology; Unifying theory.
Comment on
-
Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay.Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):521-562. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020. PMID: 32297037
References
-
- Bertone, G., & Tait, T. M. P. (2018). A new era in the search for dark matter. Nature,562, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0542-z - DOI - PubMed
-
- Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology. The new science of the mind. Sixth edition. New York: Routledge. - DOI
-
- Gerstein, M. B., Bruce, C., Rozowsky, J. S., Zheng, D., Du, J., Korbel, J. O., & Snyder, M. (2007). What is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definition. Genome Research,17, 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6339607 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2 edn, Enlarged). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
- Lewin, K. (1997a). Constructs in field theory. (Originally published in 1944). In K. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science (pp. 191–199). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources