The Compassion Competence Scale Arabic version: A validation study among student nurses and interns in Saudi Arabia
- PMID: 32363658
- DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12843
The Compassion Competence Scale Arabic version: A validation study among student nurses and interns in Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Compassion Competence Scale Arabic version for Saudi nursing students and interns.
Background: Compassion is an essential element of quality health care in which training nursing students to deliver compassionate care is important. Assessment of compassion competence of Arabic-speaking nursing students requires a valid and reliable tool.
Design: This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study.
Methods: This investigation was conducted from April to May 2019 in two universities in Saudi Arabia involving nursing students and interns. Cultural adaptation was performed using a forward-backward translation method. Content validity and construct validity through exploratory factor analysis were established. Internal consistency, stability and reliability were also determined for the scale.
Results: The Arabic version has an excellent content validity. The exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor solution that accounts for 50.62% of the scale's variance. The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.806, whereas the Cronbach's alpha of the subscales ranged from 0.739 to 0.797. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the two-week test-retest scores was 0.84. The university, gender, year level and family type predicted the students' compassion competence.
Conclusion: The Arabic version can be used to measure Arabic-speaking nursing students' compassion competence in clinical areas.
Keywords: Saudi Arabia; compassion; compassion competence; nursing, students; psychometric properties.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alghowinem, S., Goecke, R., Wagner, M., & Alwabil, A. (2019). Evaluating and validating emotion elicitation using English and Arabic movie clips on a Saudi sample. Sensors, 19, 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19102218
-
- Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
-
- Bickford, B., Daley, S., Sleater, G., Hebditch, M., & Benerjee, S. (2019). Understanding compassion for people with dementia in medical and nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 19, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1460-y
-
- Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
-
- Booth, L. (2016). Compassion: a universal language. Contemporary Nurse, 52, 366-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2016.1221325
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources