Collagen membranes of dermal and pericardial origin-In vivo evolvement of vascularization over time
- PMID: 32363796
- DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36989
Collagen membranes of dermal and pericardial origin-In vivo evolvement of vascularization over time
Abstract
Aim of the study was to compare the evolvement of vascularization over time of collagen membranes (CMs) of dermal and pericardial origin in an in vivo animal study. Twenty-eight mice underwent implantation of three commercially available CM derived from porcine dermis (homogenous structure: CM1 (Control 1) and bilayer structure: CM2 [Control 2]), from porcine pericardium (CM3; Test 1) as well as CM3 sprayed with silica-enhanced nanostructured hydroxyapatite (CM4, Test 2). After 3, 6, 9, and 12 days, intravital fluorescence microscopy was conducted for determination of capillary diameter, density, flow, and length. At Day 12, samples were examined immunohistologically for expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4), CD11b, CD68, αSMA, and CD34. In all CM, intravital fluorescence microscopy over time showed increasing values for all parameters with the highest levels in CM4 and the lowest values in CM1. Significant lower amounts of FGFR4, CD11b, and CD68 were detected in CM4 when compared to CM2 (p < .05). In contrast to CM3, lower values of αSMA and higher numbers of CD34 positive-marked vessels were observed in CM4 (p < .05). In conclusion, dermal bilayer as well as pericardial CM seem to have a higher vascularization rate than dermal homogenous CM. Additional coating of pericardial CM with a silica-enhanced hydroxyapatite increases the speed of vascularization as well as biological remodeling processes.
Keywords: angiogenesis; collagen membrane; dermal; dorsal skinfold chamber; guided bone regeneration; nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite; pericardial; silicon dioxide; vascularization.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abshagen, K., Schrodi, I., Gerber, T., & Vollmar, B. (2009). In vivo analysis of biocompatibility and vascularization of the synthetic bone grafting substitute NanoBone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 91, 557-566.
-
- Adam, M., Ganz, C., Xu, W., Sarajian, H. R., Gotz, W., & Gerber, T. (2014). In vivo and in vitro investigations of a nanostructured coating material-A preclinical study. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 9, 975-984.
-
- Amorfini, L., Migliorati, M., Signori, A., Silvestrini-Biavati, A., & Benedicenti, S. (2014). Block allograft technique versus standard guided bone regeneration: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 16, 655-667.
-
- Anderud, J., Jimbo, R., Abrahamsson, P., Isaksson, S. G., Adolfsson, E., Malmstrom, J., … Wennerberg, A. (2014). Guided bone augmentation using a ceramic space-maintaining device. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 118, 532-538.
-
- Blatt, S., Burkhardt, V., Kämmerer, P. W., Pabst, A. M., Sagheb, K., Heller, M., … Schiegnitz, E. (2020). Biofunctionalization of porcine-derived collagen matrices with platelet rich fibrin: Influence on angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Clinical Oral Investigations. [Epub ahead of print].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous