Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research
- PMID: 32364468
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745931
Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research
Abstract
Clinical trials for acute conditions such as myocardial infarction and stroke pose challenges related to informed consent due to time limitations, stress, and severe illness. Consent processes should be sensitive to the context in which trials are conducted and to needs of patients and surrogate decision-makers. This manuscript describes a collaborative effort between ethicists, researchers, patients, and surrogates to develop patient-driven, patient-centered approaches to consent for clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction and stroke.Our group identified important ways in which existing consent processes and forms for clinical trials fail to meet patients' and surrogates' needs in the acute context. We collaborated to create model forms and consent processes that are substantially shorter and, hopefully, better-matched to patients' and surrogates' needs and expectations from the perspective of content, structure, and tone. These changes, however, challenge some common conventions regarding consent.
Keywords: Informed consent; acute care; myocardial infarction; patient-centered care; research ethics; stroke.
Comment in
-
Sense and Sensibility.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):24-25. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745953. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364469 No abstract available.
-
Consent in the Acute Setting: A Necessary Evolution.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):40-42. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745932. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364470 No abstract available.
-
Partnering With Research Staff Members to Bridge Gaps in Consent.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745934. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364472 No abstract available.
-
Bridging the Researcher-Participant Gap: A Research Agenda to Build Effective Research Relationships.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):31-33. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745936. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364474 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Rules of the Road for Patient-Driven Consent Processes.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):36-37. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745938. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364476 No abstract available.
-
Better Consent-and Not Just for When Time Is Short.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1749452. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364478 No abstract available.
-
Consent Related Challenges for Neonatal Clinical Trials.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):38-40. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745940. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364480 No abstract available.
-
From Knowing to Understanding: Revisiting Consent.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):33-35. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745944. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364484 No abstract available.
-
Enlisting the Experts: Experienced Research Participants in Study Planning.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):20-22. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745948. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364488 No abstract available.
-
A Model to Be Emulated.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):18-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745949. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364489 No abstract available.
-
Consent for Acute Care Research and the Regulatory "Gray Zone".Am J Bioeth. 2020 May;20(5):26-28. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745950. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32677867 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reimagining the Goal of Informed Consent to Help Patients Make Decisions About Research.Am J Bioeth. 2020 May;20(5):22-23. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745952. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32677869 No abstract available.
-
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Partnering with Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research".Am J Bioeth. 2020 Aug;20(8):W12-W13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1782531. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32757920 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical