Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: a European Respiratory Society guideline
- PMID: 32366483
- DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00351-2020
Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: a European Respiratory Society guideline
Abstract
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with bronchodilators can reduce the frequency of exacerbations in some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is evidence, however, that ICS are frequently used in patients where their benefit has not been established. Therefore, there is a need for a personalised approach to the use of ICS in COPD and to consider withdrawal of ICS in patients without a clear indication. This document reports European Respiratory Society recommendations regarding ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD.Comprehensive evidence synthesis was performed to summarise all available evidence relevant to the question: should ICS be withdrawn in patients with COPD? The evidence was appraised using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and the results were summarised in evidence profiles. The evidence synthesis was discussed and recommendations formulated by a committee with expertise in COPD and guideline methodology.After considering the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, quality of evidence, and feasibility and acceptability of interventions, the guideline panel made: 1) conditional recommendation for the withdrawal of ICS in patients with COPD without a history of frequent exacerbations, 2) strong recommendation not to withdraw ICS in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 eosinophils·µL-1 and 3) strong recommendation to treat with one or two long-acting bronchodilators if ICS are withdrawn.A conditional recommendation indicates that there was uncertainty about the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of the intervention, and that well-informed patients may make different choices regarding whether to have or not have the specific intervention.
Copyright ©ERS 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline and Insmed; consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Insmed and Zambon; and holds research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences Grifols and Novartis. Conflict of interest: I.F. Laska has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F.M.E. Franssen reports research grants from AstraZeneca and Novartis and fees for consultancy from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK and Teva. Conflict of interest: W. Janssens reports grants, speakers’ and consultancy fees from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, Boehringer and GSK, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I. Pavord reports fees for consultancy from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Aerocrine, Almirall, Novartis, GSK, Genentech, Regeneron, Teva, Chiesi, Sanofi, Cricassia, and Knopp, grants from the National Institute for Health Research. Conflict of interest: D. Rigau is methodologist of the European Respiratory Society. Conflict of interest: M.J. McDonnell reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Menarini, grants from Health Research Board Ireland, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N. Roche reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Pfizer, and personal fees from Teva, GSK, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Mundipharma, Cipla, Sanofi, Sandoz, 3M, Trudell and Zambon. Conflict of interest: D.D. Sin has received research funding from AstraZeneca and Merck, has received honoraria for speaking engagements from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca, and fees for advisory board work from Sanofi-Aventis and Regeneron. Conflict of interest: D. Stolz reports research grants from AstraZeneca, Curetis and Boston Scientific, and fees for consultancy from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, Roche, Zambon, Pfizer and Schwabe Pharma. Conflict of interest: S. Suissa reports grants and personal fees from Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Wedzicha has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Chiesi and Johnson & Johnson. D. Stolz reports research grants from AstraZeneca, Curetis and Boston Scientific, and fees for consultancy from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, Roche, Zambon, Pfizer and Schwabe Pharma. Conflict of interest: M. Miravitlles has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, Menarini, Rovi, Bial, Sandoz, Zambon, CSL Behring, Grifols and Novartis, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Bial, Gebro Pharma, Kamada, CSL Behring, Laboratorios Esteve, Ferrer, Mereo Biopharma, Verona Pharma, Teva, pH Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi and Grifols, and research grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Grifols.
Comment in
-
Expanding the spectrum of European Respiratory Society official scientific documents: short documents complement clinical practice guidelines, statements and technical standards.Eur Respir J. 2020 Jun 4;55(6):2001030. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01030-2020. Print 2020 Jun. Eur Respir J. 2020. PMID: 32499310 No abstract available.
-
Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD.Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 9;56(1):2001684. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01684-2020. Print 2020 Jul. Eur Respir J. 2020. PMID: 32646894 No abstract available.
-
Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD.Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 9;56(1):2001778. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01778-2020. Print 2020 Jul. Eur Respir J. 2020. PMID: 32646895 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Blood eosinophil count and exacerbations in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids: a post-hoc analysis of the WISDOM trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2016 May;4(5):390-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00100-4. Epub 2016 Apr 7. Lancet Respir Med. 2016. PMID: 27066739 Clinical Trial.
-
Blood Eosinophil Counts, Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Risk of COPD Exacerbations and Mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).COPD. 2019 Apr;16(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1608172. Epub 2019 May 23. COPD. 2019. PMID: 31117850
-
Diagnosis and management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Aug 2;155(3):179-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-3-201108020-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21810710
-
Absolute Blood Eosinophil Counts to Guide Inhaled Corticosteroids Therapy Among Patients with COPD: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Curr Drug Targets. 2019;20(16):1670-1679. doi: 10.2174/1389450120666190808141625. Curr Drug Targets. 2019. PMID: 31393244
-
Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: friend or foe?Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 13;52(6):1801219. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01219-2018. Print 2018 Dec. Eur Respir J. 2018. PMID: 30190269 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and Safety of Re Du Ning Injection for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Mar 21;2022:7479639. doi: 10.1155/2022/7479639. eCollection 2022. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022. PMID: 35356238 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment Transitions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Retrospective Analyses of US and UK Healthcare Databases.Pulm Ther. 2022 Mar;8(1):75-93. doi: 10.1007/s41030-021-00180-7. Epub 2022 Jan 10. Pulm Ther. 2022. PMID: 35015269 Free PMC article.
-
EVELUT®: A Real-World, Observational Study Assessing Dyspnoea and Symptom Burden in COPD Patients Switched from LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS.Adv Ther. 2023 Jul;40(7):3263-3278. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02524-y. Epub 2023 May 31. Adv Ther. 2023. PMID: 37256536 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacotherapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Therapeutic considerations with a focus on inhaled corticosteroids.S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2020 Dec 8;62(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/safp.v62i1.5198. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2020. PMID: 33314947 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking Blood Eosinophils for Assessing Inhaled Corticosteroids Response in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis From the FLAME Trial.Chest. 2024 Nov;166(5):987-997. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3790. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Chest. 2024. PMID: 38992490 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical