Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 13;47(4):244-250.
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105963.

Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research

Affiliations

Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research

Sebastian Porsdam Mann et al. J Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Recent advances in medical and information technologies, the availability of new types of medical data, the requirement of increasing numbers of study participants, as well as difficulties in recruitment and retention, all present serious problems for traditional models of specific and informed consent to medical research. However, these advances also enable novel ways to securely share and analyse data. This paper introduces one of these advances-blockchain technologies-and argues that they can be used to share medical data in a secure and auditable fashion. In addition, some aspects of consent and data collection, as well as data access management and analysis, can be automated using blockchain-based smart contracts. This paper demonstrates how blockchain technologies can be used to further all three of the bioethical principles underlying consent requirements: the autonomy of patients, by giving them much greater control over their data; beneficence, by greatly facilitating medical research efficiency and by reducing biases and opportunities for errors; and justice, by enabling patients with rare or under-researched conditions to pseudonymously aggregate their data for analysis. Finally, we coin and describe the novel concept of prosent, by which we mean the blockchain-enabled ability of all stakeholders in the research process to pseudonymously and proactively consent to data release or exchange under specific conditions, such as trial completion.

Keywords: autonomy; confidentiality/privacy; information technology; informed consent; public health ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SPM reports grants from Carlsberg Foundation, during the conduct of the study; and is a co-founder of A&BC Consulting, which offers editing and academic consulting services. JS reports grants from Wellcome Trust, grants from Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education, grants from Murdoch Children's Research Institute, grants from Melbourne Law School, during the conduct of the study; grants from Wellcome Trust, grants from Oxford Martin School, personal fees and other from Various, outside the submitted work. PR has nothing to disclose. MB reports non-financial support from SunnyLake, outside the submitted work.

References

    1. Topol E. The Patient Will See You Now.’ Basic Books. New York, 2015.
    1. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, King NMP. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. - PubMed
    1. Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 2008. Available: www.bitcoin.org
    1. Kuo TT, Kim HE, Ohno-Machado L. ‘Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications’. J Med Am Inform Assoc 2017;24(6):211–1220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hölbl M, Kompara M, Kamišalić A, et al. ‘A Systematic Review of the Use of Blockchain in Healthcare.’. Symmetry 2018;10:470.