Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;34(6):1495-1502.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0842-9. Epub 2020 May 4.

Expert opinion-management of chronic myeloid leukemia after resistance to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Affiliations
Review

Expert opinion-management of chronic myeloid leukemia after resistance to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Andreas Hochhaus et al. Leukemia. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Regardless of line of therapy, treatment goals in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are: avoid progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis CML such that patients achieve a life expectancy comparable with that of the general population; avoid adverse events (AEs); and restore and maintain quality of life. The most important prognostic factor for achieving these goals is response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at key milestones. For patients failing a TKI, a treatment change is mandatory to limit the risk of progression and death. There is currently no precise guideline for patients that fail a second-generation TKI, and there is a paucity of data to guide clinical decision making in this setting. There is, therefore, an unmet need for practical and actionable guidance on how to manage patients who fail a second-generation TKI. Although the term 'failure' includes patients failing for resistance or intolerance, the focus of this paper is failure of a second-generation TKI because of resistance. CML patients who fail their first second-generation TKI for true resistance need a more potent therapy. In these patients, the key issues to consider are the relative appropriateness of early allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or the use of a further TKI. Selection of the next line of treatment after second-generation TKI resistance should be individualized and must be based on patient-specific factors including cytogenetics, mutation profile, comorbidities, age, previous history of AEs with prior TKI therapy, and risk profile for AEs on specific TKIs. This expert opinion paper is not in conflict with existing recommendations, but instead represents an evolution of previous notions, based on new data, insights, and clinical experience. We review the treatment options for patients resistant to second-generation TKI therapy and provide our clinical opinions and guidance on key considerations for treatment decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Members of the expert panel declare the following potential conflicts of interest: AH, Research support: BMS, Incyte, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer. Honoraria: BMS, Fusion Pharma, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda. MB, Honoraria: Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer. GS, No financial relationship to disclose. VGG, Research support: BMS, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer. Honoraria: BMS, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer. DR, Honoraria: BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Incyte. JJ, Research support: Novartis, BMS; Honoraria: Pfizer, Novartis, Incyte, Abbvie; Founder of Apps for Care and Science Foundation, developer of the HematologyApp. This non-profit organization is supported by Amgen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Takeda, Jazz, Roche, Servier, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, Incyte and BMS. JFA, Research support: Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer. Honoraria: BMS, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer. None of the authors received an honorarium for this specific work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Considerations and treatment options after second-generation TKI resistance.
aPonatinib dose based on comorbidities and mutation profile.

References

    1. Bower H, Bjorkholm M, Dickman PW, Hoglund M, Lambert PC, Andersson TM. Life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia approaches the life expectancy of the general population. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2851–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2866. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34:966–84. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hochhaus A, Larson RA, Guilhot F, Radich JP, Branford S, Hughes TP, et al. Long-term outcomes of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:917–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609324. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldberg SL, Cortes JE, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Hehlmann R, Khoury HJ, Michallet M, et al. First-line treatment selection and early monitoring patterns in chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia in routine clinical practice: SIMPLICITY. Am J Hematol. 2017;92:1214–23. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24887. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee SG, Lipton JH. Everything old is new again: the case for imatinib as frontline therapy in 2017. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2017;15:302–5. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances