Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;33(3):284-290.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000866.

Combined spinal epidural for labour analgesia and caesarean section: indications and recommendations

Emilia Guasch  1 , Nicolas Brogly  1 , Fernando Gilsanz  2
Affiliations
Review

Combined spinal epidural for labour analgesia and caesarean section: indications and recommendations

Emilia Guasch et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Even if its use is scarce in most countries, many articles concerning combined spinal epidural (CSE) were published. In this review, we present the latest advances concerning CSE in obstetrics.

Recent findings: During labour, CSE improves epidural analgesia quality. Epidural with intradural opioids can produce maternal hypotension and foetal heart rate abnormalities (FHR-Ab), without increasing the caesarean section rate. For caesarean section, CSE decreases the neuraxial block failure rate, with no significant increase of complications. Epidural volume extension (EVE) after CSE for caesarean section could be an interesting option even though more evidence is needed.

Summary: For labour analgesia, CSE has the fastest onset time of analgesia. Its side effects have no consequences on maternal, labour or foetal outcomes. It provides better analgesia than epidural analgesia and can be used for external cephalic version and high-risk patients. For caesarean section, CSE has become the reference neuraxial technique for low-dose spinal anaesthesia, with higher success rate compared with regular spinal anaesthesia. Recent systematic revisions did not confirm this superiority. CSE offers the advantage of EVE, intraoperative top-ups, postoperative administration of neuraxial opioids and local anaesthetics. The risk of complications is balanced by the benefits of the technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chau A, Tsen LC. Update on modalities and techniques for labor epidural analgesia and anesthesia. Adv Anesth 2018; 36:139–162.
    1. Versyck B, Van Houwe P. A survey of obstetric anesthesia practices in Flanders - 10 year update. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2016; 67:101–111.
    1. Miro M, Guasch E, Gilsanz F. Comparison of epidural analgesia with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: a retrospective study of 6497 cases. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17:15–19.
    1. Shatalin D, Weiniger CF, Buchman I, et al. A 10-year update: national survey questionnaire of obstetric anesthesia units in Israel. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019; 38:83–92.
    1. Simmons SW, Dennis AT, Cyna AM, et al. Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10:CD008100.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources