Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;31(6):1593-1596.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006481.

Alloplastic Auricular Reconstruction: Review of Implant Types, Adverse Events, and Aesthetic Outcomes

Jeremie D Oliver  1 , Daniel Rodriguez  2 , Derek Scott  2 , Katherine B Santosa  3 , Michael S Hu  4
Affiliations

Alloplastic Auricular Reconstruction: Review of Implant Types, Adverse Events, and Aesthetic Outcomes

Jeremie D Oliver et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Importance: Alloplastic implants have been applied successfully in reconstruction of the external ear, either for congenital microtia or traumatic injury.

Objective: The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of alloplastic implant materials utilized in the reconstruction of the external ear stratified by indication, specific implant type, postoperative complications, and aesthetic outcomes.

Evidence review: A comprehensive systematic review of published literature on alloplastic external ear reconstruction data was conducted utilizing Medline/PubMed database without timeframe limitations in June 2019. Articles were stratified by (1) indication (microtia versus trauma reconstruction) and (2) implant material type. All postoperative complications were recorded and comparatively analyzed between implant types. Aesthetic outcomes were also identified and compared between implant types.

Findings: A total of 755 patients (14 case series; follow-up range = 3 months--10 years) met the criteria for this study. Overall complication rate was 12.05% across all indications and materials used. The most frequent complications reported were graft exposure (7.8%), graft explantation (1.72%), and wound dehiscence (0.8%). Of the patients requiring graft explantation (n = 13), 7 (53.85%) received Medpor implants, and the other 6 (46.15%) were identified in silicone implants. Infection was only reported in Medpor implants. The overall rate of an acceptable aesthetic outcome was 99.34%.

Conclusions and relevance: Alloplastic implants are a reliable means of achieving an acceptable complication profile in external ear reconstruction. While there was an overall high rate of acceptable aesthetic outcomes, the studies evaluated in this systematic review differed in their criteria for final evaluation of aesthetic outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bly RA, Bhrany AD, Murakami CS, et al. Microtia reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24:577591.
    1. Storck K, Staudenmaier R, Buchberger M, et al. Total reconstruction of the auricle: our experiences on indications and recent techniques. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014:373286.
    1. Owen S, Wang T, Stephan S. Alloplastic reconstruction of the microtic ear. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 28:97104.
    1. Berghaus A. Implants for reconstructive surgery of the nose and ears. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 6:Doc06.
    1. Kolodzynski MN, Kon M, Egger S, et al. Mechanisms of ear trauma and reconstructive techniques in 105 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 274:723728.

Publication types