Impact of perioperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
- PMID: 32372221
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07604-6
Impact of perioperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis
Abstract
Background: In laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) for patients who receive antiplatelet therapy (APT), it remains unclear whether APT should be continued or temporarily withdrawn. We investigated the safety of perioperative aspirin continuation, specifically focused on bleeding complications.
Methods: We performed retrospective analysis utilizing propensity score-matching (PSM). In total, 789 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and were divided into two groups. Patients in the continued aspirin monotherapy (cAPT) group continued treatment perioperatively with not more than 2 days of withdrawal (n = 140). Patients with more than 3 days withdrawal of aspirin or who did not receive APT at all were assigned to the non-cAPT group (n = 649). After 1:1 PSM, 105 patients were extracted from each group. Perioperative APT management was determined based on our institutional committee-approved guidelines for antithrombotic management.
Results: In PSM cohorts, all patient demographics were comparable between the groups. Regarding intraoperative outcomes, we found no significant difference in operation duration (p = 0.969), blood loss (p = 0.068), and blood transfusion (p = 0.517). Postoperative overall morbidity was 20.0% and 13.3% in the cAPT and non-cAPT groups, respectively (p = 0.195). The incidence of bleeding complications was also comparable between the groups (2.9% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.317). Assessing the 14 cases with bleeding complications overall in the full cohort, all 7 cases in the non-cAPT group had anastomotic bleeding, which was generally observed shortly after surgery [median postoperative day (POD) 1]. All 7 cases in the cAPT group received additional antithrombotics other than aspirin; bleeding occurred at various sites relatively later (median POD 7), mostly after reinstitution of additional antithrombotic agents.
Conclusions: For patients receiving APT, perioperative continuation of aspirin monotherapy could be safe in laparoscopic CRC surgery; however, careful consideration is required at reinstitution of additional antithrombotics where multiple antithrombotic agents are used.
Keywords: Bleeding complications; Colorectal cancer; Continuous antiplatelet therapy; Laparoscopic surgery; Propensity score-matched analyses.
Similar articles
-
Does antiplatelet therapy affect outcomes of patients receiving abdominal laparoscopic surgery? Lessons from more than 1,000 laparoscopic operations in a single tertiary referral hospital.J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):1044-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 17. J Am Coll Surg. 2013. PMID: 24051069
-
Optimal use of antiplatelet agents, especially aspirin, in the perioperative management of colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection.World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1634-4. World J Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31153382 Free PMC article.
-
Is laparoscopic colorectal surgery with continuation of antiplatelet therapy safe without increasing bleeding complications?Surg Today. 2019 Nov;49(11):948-957. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01839-0. Epub 2019 Jun 22. Surg Today. 2019. PMID: 31230127 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in noncardiac surgery.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Jun;33(3):454-462. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000875. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32371645 Review.
-
Open and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy in men receiving ongoing low-dose aspirin medication: revisiting an old paradigm?BJU Int. 2014 Sep;114(3):396-403. doi: 10.1111/bju.12504. Epub 2014 Jul 15. BJU Int. 2014. PMID: 24127902 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety of cholecystectomy in patients under antithrombotic Drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Nov-Dec;38(8):2365-2372. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.7032. Pak J Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 36415256 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Antithrombotic Therapy on the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.Cureus. 2022 Mar 22;14(3):e23390. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23390. eCollection 2022 Mar. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35481301 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perioperative Antithrombotic Management During Gastroenterological Surgery in Patients With Thromboembolic Risks: Current Status and Future Prospects.Cureus. 2022 Mar 24;14(3):e23471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23471. eCollection 2022 Mar. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35494939 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2025 Jul 21;17(7):e88473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88473. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40851691 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the continuation and discontinuation of perioperative antiplatelet therapy in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study (YCOG 1603).Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Oct 28;5(1):67-74. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12387. eCollection 2021 Jan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020. PMID: 33532682 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
-
- Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484 - PubMed
-
- The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
-
- Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229 - PubMed
-
- Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW, Hellinger M, Flanagan R, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 (discussion 662-664) - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous