Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;68(6):1143-1149.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.16539.

Rationing Limited Healthcare Resources in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond: Ethical Considerations Regarding Older Adults

Affiliations

Rationing Limited Healthcare Resources in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond: Ethical Considerations Regarding Older Adults

Timothy W Farrell et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to impact older adults disproportionately with respect to serious consequences ranging from severe illness and hospitalization to increased mortality risk. Concurrently, concerns about potential shortages of healthcare professionals and health supplies to address these issues have focused attention on how these resources are ultimately allocated and used. Some strategies, for example, misguidedly use age as an arbitrary criterion that disfavors older adults in resource allocation decisions. This is a companion article to the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) position statement, "Resource Allocation Strategies and Age-Related Considerations in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond." It is intended to inform stakeholders including hospitals, health systems, and policymakers about ethical considerations that should be considered when developing strategies for allocation of scarce resources during an emergency involving older adults. This review presents the legal and ethical background for the position statement and discusses these issues that informed the development of the AGS positions: (1) age as a determining factor, (2) age as a tiebreaker, (3) criteria with a differential impact on older adults, (4) individual choices and advance directives, (5) racial/ethnic disparities and resource allocation, and (6) scoring systems and their impact on older adults. It also considers the role of advance directives as expressions of individual preferences in pandemics. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1143-1149, 2020.

Keywords: COVID-19; ethics; older adult; rationing; triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, et al. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model‐based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:30243‐7. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Response Epidemiology Team . The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) in China [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Za Zhi. 2020;41(2):145‐151. - PubMed
    1. CDC COVID‐19 Response Team . Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) ‐ United States, February 12‐March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(12):343‐346. - PMC - PubMed
    1. D'Adamo H, Yoshikawa T, Ouslander JG. Coronavirus disease 2019 in geriatrics and long‐term care: the ABCDs of COVID‐19. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(5):912‐917. 10.1111/jgs.16445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. White DB, Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID‐19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1773‐1774. 10.1001/jama.2020.5046. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types