Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):541-552.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa059.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure

Chanu Rhee  1   2 , Kathleen Chiotos  3 , Sara E Cosgrove  4 , Emily L Heil  5 , Sameer S Kadri  6 , Andre C Kalil  7 , David N Gilbert  8 , Henry Masur  6 , Edward J Septimus  1   9 , Daniel A Sweeney  10 , Jeffrey R Strich  6 , Dean L Winslow  11 , Michael Klompas  1   2
Affiliations

Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure

Chanu Rhee et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) measure has appropriately established sepsis as a national priority. However, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA and five additional endorsing societies) is concerned about SEP-1's potential to drive antibiotic overuse because it does not account for the high rate of sepsis overdiagnosis and encourages aggressive antibiotics for all patients with possible sepsis, regardless of the certainty of diagnosis or severity of illness. IDSA is also concerned that SEP-1's complex "time zero" definition is not evidence-based and is prone to inter-observer variation. In this position paper, IDSA outlines several recommendations aimed at reducing the risk of unintended consequences of SEP-1 while maintaining focus on its evidence-based elements. IDSA's core recommendation is to limit SEP-1 to septic shock, for which the evidence supporting the benefit of immediate antibiotics is greatest. Prompt empiric antibiotics are often appropriate for suspected sepsis without shock, but IDSA believes there is too much heterogeneity and difficulty defining this population, uncertainty about the presence of infection, and insufficient data on the necessity of immediate antibiotics to support a mandatory treatment standard for all patients in this category. IDSA believes guidance on managing possible sepsis without shock is more appropriate for guidelines that can delineate the strengths and limitations of supporting evidence and allow clinicians discretion in applying specific recommendations to individual patients. Removing sepsis without shock from SEP-1 will mitigate the risk of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for noninfectious syndromes, simplify data abstraction, increase measure reliability, and focus attention on the population most likely to benefit from immediate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Keywords: IDSA; SEP-1; sepsis; septic shock; severe sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Hospital compare website. Available at: https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare. Accessed 15 November 2019.
    1. The Joint Commission. Specifications manual for national hospital inpatient quality measures. 2018. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/specifications_manual_for_national_hospi.... Accessed 15 November 2019.
    1. Townsend SR , Tefera L, Rivers EP. Evidence underpinning the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ severe sepsis and septic shock management bundle (SEP-1). Ann Intern Med 2018; 168:609–10. - PubMed
    1. Pepper DJ , Jaswal D, Sun J, Welsh J, Natanson C, Eichacker PQ. Evidence underpinning the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ severe sepsis and septic shock management bundle (SEP-1): a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168:558–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aaronson EL , Filbin MR, Brown DF, Tobin K, Mort EA. New mandated Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requirements for sepsis reporting: caution from the field. J Emerg Med 2017; 52:109–16. - PubMed

Substances