Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;24(3):590-600.
doi: 10.1111/eje.12540. Epub 2020 May 22.

Developing consensus in identifying challenges of undergraduate orthodontic education in Malaysian public universities using e-Delphi

Affiliations
Review

Developing consensus in identifying challenges of undergraduate orthodontic education in Malaysian public universities using e-Delphi

Gururajaprasad Kaggal Lakshmana Rao et al. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to seek consensus, identify and explore the challenges facing undergraduate orthodontic education and propose equitable solutions for overcoming the challenges amongst Malaysian public university dental schools.

Methods: An iterative e-Delphi technique was employed as the method for gathering consensus on a range of topics found pertinent to affect orthodontic teaching and learning established through literature review. A total of ten expert panellists were recruited through a targeted invitation to the orthodontists from Malaysian public universities offering undergraduate dental education. The e-Delphi comprised of three rounds of anonymous e-survey. The consensus was sought for two open-ended and two closed-ended questions.

Results: The response rates for all the three rounds were 100 per cent. The total number of questions responded by the participants in all the three rounds was forty-four. Round one achieved consensus on two closed-ended questions. Round two achieved a consensus on twenty-eight out of thirty-four (82.35%) questions with round three achieving a consensus on four out of six (66.66%) questions. A 70% consensus was considered as the minimum level of agreement for all the rounds. In total, consensus and agreement were achieved on two closed-ended questions and twenty-nine items from the open-ended questions.

Conclusion: The study was able to identify a range of issues affecting undergraduate orthodontic education with a good level of consensus using the e-Delphi technique highlighting the need for curriculum refinement. The study has, in addition, proposed tangible methods to enable such a change.

Keywords: Delphi technique; Malaysia; dental education; e-Delphi; orthodontic education; public university.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chadwick SM, Bearn DR, Jack AC, O'Brien KD. Orthodontic undergraduate education: developments in a modern curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ. 2002;6:57-63.
    1. Komabayashi T, Razak AA, Bird WF. Dental education in Malaysia. Int Dent J. 2007;57:429-432.
    1. Walker AM, Selfe J. The Delphi method: a useful tool for the allied health researcher. Br J Ther Rehabil. 1996;3:677-681.
    1. Thangaratinam S, Redman CWE. The Delphi technique. Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;7:120-125.
    1. Day J, Bobeva M. A generic toolkit for the successful management of Delphi studies. Elec J Bus Res Method. 2005;3:103-116.

LinkOut - more resources