Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 May 6;20(1):268.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02960-6.

Health management committee strengthening and community mobilisation through women's groups to improve trained health worker attendance at birth in rural Nepal: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Health management committee strengthening and community mobilisation through women's groups to improve trained health worker attendance at birth in rural Nepal: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Joanna Morrison et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Engaging citizens and communities to make services accountable is vital to achieving health development goals. Community participation in health management committees can increase public accountability of health services. We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the impact of strengthened health management committees (HMCs) and community mobilisation through women's groups on institutional deliveries and deliveries by trained health workers in rural Nepal.

Methods: The study was conducted in all Village Development Committee clusters in the hills district of Makwanpur (population of 420,500). In 21 intervention clusters, we conducted three-day workshops with HMCs to improve their capacity for planning and action and supported female community health volunteers to run women's groups. These groups met once a month and mobilised communities to address barriers to institutional delivery through participatory learning and action cycles. We compared this intervention with 22 control clusters. Prospective surveillance from October 2010 to the end of September 2012 captured complete data on 13,721 deliveries in intervention and control areas. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: The women's group intervention was implemented as intended, but we were unable to support HMCs as planned because many did not meet regularly. The activities of community based organisations were systematically targeted at control clusters, which meant that there were no true 'control' clusters. 39% (5403) of deliveries were in health institutions and trained health workers attended most of them. There were no differences between trial arms in institutional delivery uptake (1.45, 0.76-2.78) or attendance by trained health workers (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.74-2.74).

Conclusions: The absence of a true counterfactual and inadequate coverage of the HMC strengthening intervention impedes our ability to draw conclusions. Further research is needed to test the effectiveness of strengthening public accountability mechanisms on increased utilisation of services at delivery.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN99834806. Date of registration:28/09/10.

Keywords: Health systems; Maternal; Newborn; Participation; Public accountability; South Asia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial Cluster Allocation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
4 ‘D’ Cycle of Appreciative Inquiry
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Responsive HMC case study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Less responsive HMC case study
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Consort diagram

References

    1. Sheikh K, Ranson M, Gilson L. Explorations on people centredness in health systems. Health Policy Planning. 2014;29:ii1–ii5. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu082. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul S. Accountability in public services: exit, voice and capture. Washington DC: The World Bank; 1991.
    1. Street J, Duszynski K, Krawczyk S, Braunack-Mayer A. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;109. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. - PubMed
    1. McCoy D, Hall J, Ridge M. A systematic review of the literature for evidence on health facility committees in low and middle income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27:449–466. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr077. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molyneux S, Atela M, Angwenyi V, Goodman C. Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27:541–554. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr083. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types