Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 6;20(1):275.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02974-0.

Obstetric triage systems: a systematic review of measurement properties (Clinimetric)

Affiliations

Obstetric triage systems: a systematic review of measurement properties (Clinimetric)

Asieh Moudi et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Since labor and delivery units often serve as emergency units for pregnant women, the use of obstetric triage systems with poor or inadequate quality can lead to unintended consequences such as over and under-triage and so a waste of humans and financial resources. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to evaluate the measurement properties of obstetric triage tools.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline were searched to identify studies in October 2018 and were updated in May 2019. The risk of bias COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The quality of every measurement property was appraised by the update criteria of COSMIN. Evidence quality was judged using the modified GRADE approach.

Results: A total of 444 studies were retrieved in initial search. Six studies evaluating 4 tools were included in this study. All the included studies reported only content validity and reliability. The quality of evidence varied from very low to moderate. The quality of content validity and reliability of the included tools was sufficient except for the reliability of the maternal-fetal triage index. The obstetric triage acuity scale (OTAS) was found to have higher reliability than other tools.

Conclusions: Due to insufficient evidence, the conclusions about the quality of measurement properties of each obstetric triage tool may be uncertain. This review emphasizes the necessity for further studies with robust methodological quality on the measurement properties of obstetric triage tools.

Keywords: COSMIN; Measurement properties; Obstetric; Pregnancy; Systematic review; Triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The PRISMA flow diagram for an overview of the study selected

References

    1. Forshaw J, Raybould S, Lewis E, Muyingo M, Weeks A, Reed K, et al. Exploring the third delay: an audit evaluating obstetric triage at Mulago National Referral Hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1098-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angelini DJ, LaFontaine D. Obstetric triage and emergency care protocols. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2017.
    1. Nakao H, Ukai I, Kotani J. A review of the history of the origin of triage from a disaster medicine perspective. Acute Med Surg. 2017;4(4):279–384. doi: 10.1002/ams2.293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safari SRF, Baratloo AR, Motaamadi M, Foruzanfar MM, Hashemi B, Majidi AR. Hospital and pre-hospital triage systems in normal and disaster conditions; a review article. Iran Emerg Med J. 2015;2(1):9.
    1. Committee Opinion No. 667 Summary: Hospital-Based Triage of Obstetric Patients. ObstetGynecol. 2016;128(1):228. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001522. - PubMed

Publication types