Program Fidelity and Patient Satisfaction among Women Served by the Zika Contraception Access Network Program in Puerto Rico
- PMID: 32376188
- PMCID: PMC7370655
- DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.03.007
Program Fidelity and Patient Satisfaction among Women Served by the Zika Contraception Access Network Program in Puerto Rico
Abstract
Background: The Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) was designed to provide women in Puerto Rico who chose to delay or avoid pregnancy during the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak access to high-quality client-centered contraceptive counseling and the full range of reversible contractive methods on the same day and at no cost through a network of trained providers. We evaluated the implementation of Z-CAN from the patient perspective.
Methods: An online survey, administered to a subset of women served by the Z-CAN program approximately 2 weeks after their initial Z-CAN visit, assessed patient satisfaction and receipt of services consistent with select program strategies: receipt of high-quality client-centered contraceptive counseling, same-day access to the contraceptive method they were most interested in after counseling, and no-cost contraception.
Results: Of 3,503 respondents, 85.2% reported receiving high-quality client-centered contraceptive counseling. Among women interested in a contraceptive method after counseling (n = 3,470), most reported same-day access to that method (86.8%) and most reported receiving some method of contraception at no cost (87.4%). Women who reported receiving services according to Z-CAN program strategies were more likely than those who did not to be very satisfied with services. Women who received high-quality client-centered contraceptive counseling and same-day access to the method they were most interested in after counseling were also more likely to be very satisfied with the contraceptive method received.
Conclusions: A contraception access program can be rapidly implemented with high fidelity to program strategies in a fast-moving and complex public health emergency setting.
Copyright © 2020 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- August EM, Rosenthal J, Torrez R, Romero L, Berry-Bibee EN, Frey MT, . Lathrop E (2020). Community understanding of contraception during the Zika virus outbreak in Puerto Rico. Health Promotion and Practice, 21(1), 133–141. - PubMed
-
- Boring CC, Rochat RW, & Becerra J (1988). Sterilization regret among Puerto Rican women. Fertility & Sterility, 49(6), 973–981. - PubMed
-
- Briggs L (1994). Contraceptive programs: The risk of coercion. Women’s Health Journal, 52–53.
-
- Briggs L (1998). Discourses of “forced sterilization” in Puerto Rico: The problem with the speaking subaltern. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 30–66.
-
- Dehlendorf C, Fox E, Ahrens K, Gavin L, Hoffman A, & Hessler D (2017a). Creating a brief measure for patient experience of contraceptive care: Reduction of the interpersonal quality of family planning scale in preparation for testing as a performance measure. Contraception, 96(4), 290.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical