Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry
- PMID: 32376416
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.001
Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry
Abstract
Background: Identifying the individual hemodynamic significance of tandem coronary artery lesions can be complicated by the crosstalk phenomenon which occurs between serial stenoses under hyperemic conditions. Physiological assessments performed under resting conditions are considered to be, theoretically, less affected by the hemodynamic interaction between serial coronary stenoses. The purpose of this study was to assess whether pressure-wire (PW) pullback measurements at rest and during hyperemia provided different information as to which stenosis appeared to be most functionally significant.
Methods: In consecutive patients with angiographically discrete serial lesions, physiological lesion predominance (i.e. proximal or distal) was defined according to the pressure gradient along the vessels on PW-pullback trace. We used instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) based assessment as the reference standard and compared fractional flow reserve (FFR) based and hyperemic-iFR based lesion predominance.
Results: Eighty-eight vessels (70 patients, mean age 70.3 ± 9.4 years, 80% male) were included in this study. Median iFR, FFR and hyperemic-iFR were 0.85 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.74 to 0.91), 0.73 (IQR: 0.65 to 0.80) and 0.60 (IQR: 0.49 to 0.71), respectively. When judged against iFR-pullback based physiological assessment, lesion predominance changed in 22.7% (20/88) in FFR and in 20.5% (18/88) in hyperemic-iFR, respectively. There was no statistical difference between FFR and hyperemic-iFR for the impact on these changes (p = 0.77).
Conclusions: In serial coronary lesions, hyperemic PW-pullback disagreed with resting PW-pullback on the lesion-specific identification of ischemia in approximately 20% of cases, either in whole cardiac cycle or in wave-free period.
Keywords: Fractional flow reserve; Instantaneous wave-free ratio; Pressure-wire pullback; Serial coronary lesions.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest TW reports consultancies work for Abbott Vascular and Philips Vocano. JED reports consultancies work for Philips Vocano and is an inventor of iFR technology and holds intellectual property which is under license. CC has received speaker's honoraria from Philips Vocano. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Adverse Plaque Characteristics Relate More Strongly With Hyperemic Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Than With Resting Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar;13(3):746-756. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Aug 14. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31422133 Clinical Trial.
-
Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2514-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.021. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 29268881 Free PMC article.
-
Discordance Between Resting and Hyperemic Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity: The VERIFY 2 Study (A Comparative Study of Resting Coronary Pressure Gradient, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography).Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11):e004016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004016. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27834663
-
Instantaneous wave-free ratio as an alternative to fractional flow reserve in assessment of moderate coronary stenoses: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(5 Pt B):613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018. PMID: 29371084 Review.
-
The Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pullback: a novel innovation using baseline physiology to optimise coronary angioplasty in tandem lesions.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Apr-May;16(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 29. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015. PMID: 25977227 Review.
Cited by
-
Physiology-Based Revascularization: A New Approach to Plan and Optimize Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.JACC Asia. 2021 May 21;1(1):14-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.03.002. eCollection 2021 Jun. JACC Asia. 2021. PMID: 36338358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan.Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):386-402. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01030-4. Epub 2024 Jul 30. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024. PMID: 39078544 Review.
-
Contemporary Use of Coronary Physiology in Cardiology.Cardiol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(4):589-614. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00329-2. Epub 2023 Sep 5. Cardiol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37668939 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Serial stenosis assessment-can we rely on invasive coronary physiology.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 2;10:1172906. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1172906. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37200979 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Editorial: Challenges in the contemporary assessment of coronary physiology.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 12;10:1305913. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1305913. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37900567 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources