Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 30;40(3):316-320.
doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.03.03.

[Effect of heat inactivation of blood samples on the efficacy of three detection methods of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies]

[Article in Chinese]
Xiongyan Xue  1 , Changlin Zhu  1 , Shaozhen Huang  1 , Lianhua Pan  1 , Jianhua Xu  2 , Weixuan Li  1
Affiliations

[Effect of heat inactivation of blood samples on the efficacy of three detection methods of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies]

[Article in Chinese]
Xiongyan Xue et al. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. .

Abstract
in English, Chinese

Objective: To evaluate the effects of heat inactivation of blood samples at 56℃ for 30 min on the results of SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection using different methods.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 11 patients with established diagnosis of COVID-19 and 10 patients with diseases other than COVID- 19 in our hospital. We collected samples of serum, plasma and whole blood from each patient between February, 12 and 18, 2020, and with a double- blind design, the samples were examined for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies before and after heat inactivation at 56 ℃ for 30 min. In all the samples, the total SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected using immunochromatography, and the IgM antibodies were detected using fluorescence immunochromatography; the IgM and IgG antibodies in the serum and plasma samples detected with chemiluminescence immunoassay. We compared the detection results and analyzed the correlation of semi-quantitative detection results of IgM and IgG antibodies before and after heat inactivation of the samples.

Results: With immuno-chromatography, the coincidence rate of the total SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection before and after heat inactivation of the serum and plasma samples was 90.0% in COVID-19 cases and 100.0% in the negative cases, resulting in a total coincidence rate 95.2%; for the whole blood samples, the total coincidence rates of the total SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were 100.0%. For detection of IgM antibodies in the serum, plasma and whole blood samples using fluorescence immunochromatography, the coincidence rates in SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative cases and the total coincidence rate before and after inactivation were 100.0%, 0 and 47.6%, respectively. For detection of serum IgM and IgG antibodies and plasma IgG antibodies with chemiluminescence immunoassay, the coincidence rates in SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative cases and the total coincidence rate before and after inactivation were all 100.0%, and the total coincidence rate of plasma IgM antibodies was 95.2%. Pearson correlation analysis of the semi-quantitative results of IgM and IgG detection in the serum and plasma samples showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9999 (95%CI: 0.9998-1.000, P < 0.001) between the results before and after sample inactivation.

Conclusions: Heat inactivation of blood samples at 56 ℃ for 30 min does not obviously affect the results of immunochromatography and chemiluminescent immunoassay for detection of SARS-COV-2 antibodies but can reduce the risk of infection for the operators. Heat-inactivated samples can not be used in fluorescence immunochromatography for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection.

目的: 探讨56 ℃ 30 min灭活处理对不同方法测定2019新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)抗体检测结果的影响。

方法: 本文为回顾性研究。收集2020年2月12~18日在佛山市第一人民医院确诊为新型冠状病毒性肺炎患者血清样本、血浆样本及全血样本各11份, 同时收集同期疑似病例及其他疾病患者血清、血浆及全血样本各10份, 采用双盲法, 在样本采用56℃ 30 min灭活处理前后, 分别采用免疫层析法检测样本中的SARS-CoV-2总抗体、采用荧光免疫层析法检测样本中的SARS-CoV-2 IgM抗体、采用化学发光荧光免疫分析法检测血清及血浆样本SARS-CoV-2 IgM及SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 比较灭活前与灭活处理后样本的抗体检测结果, 并采用Pearson相关性分析灭活前后检测IgM及IgG半定量检测结果的相关性。

结果: 免疫层析法检测灭活前后血清与血浆样本中SARS-CoV-2总抗体的阳性样本符合率为90.9%, 阴性符合率为100.0%, 总符合率均为95.2%。免疫层析法检测灭活前后全血样本中SARS-CoV-2总抗体的总符合率为100.0%。荧光免疫层析法检测灭活前后血清、血浆及全血样本中SARS-CoV-2 IgM抗体的阳性符合率均为100.0%, 阴性符合率均为0%, 总符合率均为47.6%。化学发光免疫分析法检测灭活前后血清样本中SARS-CoV-2 IgM及IgG抗体及血浆中的IgG抗体, 阳性符合率、阴性符合率及总符合率均为100.0%, 检测血浆IgM抗体的总符合率为95.2%。采用Pearson相关对灭活前后血清及血浆样本IgM和IgG半定量检测结果进行相关性分析, 其中IgM灭活前后结果的相关系数为0.9999(95%CI:0.9998~1.000, P < 0.001), IgG灭活前后结果的相关系数为0.9999(95%CI:0.9998~1.000, P < 0.001)。

结论: 56 ℃ 30 min灭活处理血液样本对免疫层析法及化学发光免疫分析法检测SARS-CoV-2抗体结果几乎无影响, 可在检测前先进行灭活以降低检验人员感染风险, 荧光免疫层析法不可使用灭活后样本进行检测。

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; heat inactivation; plasma; serum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

1
1
灭活前后化学发光法检测IgM结果相关性 Correlation between chemiluminescence immunoassay results before and after heat inactivation of the samples.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Nishiura H, Jung SM, Linton NM, et al. The extent of transmission of novel coronavirus in wuhan, China, 2020. J Clin Med. 2020;24(9):pii: E330. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020330. [Nishiura H, Jung SM, Linton NM, et al. The extent of transmission of novel coronavirus in wuhan, China, 2020[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 24 (9). pii: E330. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020330.] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. HuiDS, I AzharE, MadaniTA, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epi-demic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health-the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;91:264–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009. [HuiDS, I AzharE, MadaniTA, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epi-demic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health-the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2020, 91: 264-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009.] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

    1. 关于印发医疗机构内新型冠状病毒感染预防与控制技术指南(第一版)的通知(.国卫办医函[2020]65号)[EB/OL].2020. <a href="http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202001/b91fdab7c304431eb082d67847d27e14.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202001/b91fdab7c304431eb082d67847d27e14.shtml</a>.

    1. 华 文浩, 盛 琳君, 宋 丽红, et al. 生物安全Ⅱ级实验室开展新型冠状病毒感染患者实验检测的风险评估与防控. 中华检验医学杂志. 2020;43(00):E007–E007. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2010.0007. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2010.0007. [华文浩, 盛琳君, 宋丽红, 等.生物安全Ⅱ级实验室开展新型冠状病毒感染患者实验检测的风险评估与防控[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2020, 43(00): E007-E007. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2010.0007.] - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. 陈 培松, 何 宇婷, 黄 裕立, et al. 不同方式灭活口咽拭子标本对2019新型冠状病毒实时荧光定量PCR检测结果的影响. 中华检验医学杂志. 2020;43(00):E004–E004. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2020.0004. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2020.0004. [陈培松, 何宇婷, 黄裕立, 等.不同方式灭活口咽拭子标本对2019新型冠状病毒实时荧光定量PCR检测结果的影响[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2020, 43(00): E004-E004. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2020.0004.] - DOI - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources