Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 6:369:m875.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m875.

Health and nutrition claims for infant formula are poorly substantiated and potentially harmful

Daniel Munblit  1   2 , Helen Crawley  3 , Richard Hyde  4 , Robert J Boyle  5   6
Affiliations

Health and nutrition claims for infant formula are poorly substantiated and potentially harmful

Daniel Munblit et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Marketing claims for infant formula should be banned, argue Daniel Munblit and colleagues

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following interests: DM and RJB have received consultancy payment from Dairy Goat Co-Operative (NZ) for designing a clinical trial of an infant formula. RJB is senior editor for the children and families network of Cochrane Review Groups, has acted as an expert witness in a class action relating to an infant formula health claim, and previously led a Food Standards Agency commissioned systematic review of the evidence for hydrolysed formula preventing allergic conditions. RJB’s employer, Imperial College London, has a formal research and innovation partnership with Nestlé, who manufacture and market infant formula products and sponsor infant formula research. Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

    1. Belamarich PF, Bochner RE, Racine AD. A critical review of the marketing claims of infant formula products in the United States. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2016;55:437-42. 10.1177/0009922815589913 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crawley H, Westland S. “Scientific and factual”? A review of breastmilk substitute advertising to healthcare professionals: First Steps Nutrition Trust, 2016. https://www.firststepsnutrition.org/pdfs/Scientific_and_Factual_booklet_...
    1. Hughes HK, Landa MM, Sharfstein JM. Marketing claims for infant formula: the need for evidence. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171:105-6. . 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3837 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, et al. Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group . Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet 2016;387:491-504. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tijhuis MJ, Doets EL, Vonk Noordegraaf-Schouten M. Extensive literature search and review as preparatory work for the evaluation of the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae and growing-up milk. EFSA supporting publication, Contract No: EN-551. Pallas Health Research and Consultancy, 2014. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2903/sp.efsa.2014.EN-551 - DOI