Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 26;53(3):247-251.
doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.94759. eCollection 2019.

Minimally Invasive Open Surgical Approach and Outcomes for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Affiliations

Minimally Invasive Open Surgical Approach and Outcomes for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

İsmail Yüce et al. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. .

Abstract

Objectives: The most common peripheral neuropathy is carpal tunnel syndrome. The present study aims to describe our minimally invasive open surgical approach for carpal tunnel syndrome and evaluate surgical outcomes.

Methods: We included 217 patients who were operated in our clinic for carpal tunnel syndrome by minimally invasive open surgical approach. Visual Analogue Scale and Functional Outcome Scale scores were obtained preoperative, postoperative at one month and three months to determine surgical outcomes.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.4±12.8 years (32 to 69), 175 (80.6%) were women and 42 (19.4%) were men. The assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome's etiology showed that 189 (%87.1%) of the cases were idiopathic, 19 (8.8%) had hypothyroidism, 5 (2.3%) had rheumatoid arthritis and 4 (1.8%) were due to pregnancy. The average improvement of VAS between preoperatively and late postoperatively was 5.41±1.05. The average improvement FOS was 17.44±3.06. They were statistically significant.

Conclusion: The minimally invasive open surgical approach for carpal tunnel syndrome (an average of 1 cm skin incision) is performed with local anesthesia and successful surgical outcomes are achieved.

Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome; minimally invasive open surgical approach; transverse carpal ligament.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surgical instruments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Location of skin incision.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reach to the transverse carpal ligament.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cutting the transverse carpal ligament.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Checking the proximal end of the ligament.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Checking the distal part of the transverse carpal ligament.

Similar articles

References

    1. Heyman VB. Electrophysiological testing. In: Gelberman RH, editor. Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 1991. pp. 170–81.
    1. Szabo RM. Entrapment and compression neuropathies. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, editors. Green's operative hand surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. pp. 1404–47.
    1. D'Arcy CA, McGee S. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA. 2000;283:3110–7. - PubMed
    1. Kerr CD, Gittins ME, Sybert DR. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release:clinical results. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:266–9. - PubMed
    1. Phalen GS. Reflections on 21 years'experience with the carpal-tunnel syndrome. JAMA. 1970;25(212):1365–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources