Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Nov;127(12):1470-1479.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16303. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Interpregnancy interval and risk of perinatal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A K Regan  1   2 , A Arnaout  2 , L Marinovich  2 , C Marston  3 , I Patino  1 , R Kaur  1 , A Gebremedhin  2 , G Pereira  2   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interpregnancy interval and risk of perinatal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A K Regan et al. BJOG. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Interpregnancy interval (IPI) <6 months is a potentially modifiable risk factor for adverse perinatal health outcomes.

Objective: This systematic review evaluated the international literature on the risk of perinatal death associated with IPI.

Search strategy: Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus from inception to 4 April 2019 (Prospero Registration #CRD42018092792).

Selection criteria: Studies were included if they provided a description of IPI measurement and perinatal death, including stillbirth and neonatal death.

Data collection and analysis: A narrative review was performed for all included studies. Random effects meta-analysis was used to compare unadjusted odds of perinatal death associated with IPI <6 months and IPI ≥6 months. Analyses were performed by outcome of the preceding pregnancy and study location.

Main results: Of the 624 unique articles identified, 26 met the inclusion criteria. The pooled unadjusted odds ratio of perinatal death for IPI <6 months was 1.34 (95% CI 1.17-1.53) following a previous live birth, 0.85 (95% CI 0.73-0.99) following a previous miscarriage and 1.07 (95% CI 0.84-1.36) following a previous stillbirth compared with IPI ≥6 months. However, few high-income country studies reported an association after adjustment. Fewer studies evaluated the impact of long IPI on perinatal death and what evidence was available showed mixed results.

Conclusions: Results suggest a possible association between short IPI and risk of perinatal death following a live birth, particularly in low- to middle-income countries.

Tweetable abstract: Short IPI <6 months after a live birth was associated with greater risk of perinatal death than IPI ≥6 months.

Keywords: Birth intervals; birth spacing; interpregnancy interval; perinatal death; stillbirth; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Yoshida S, Martines J, Lawn JE, Wall S, Souza JP, Rudan I, et al. Setting research priorities to improve global newborn health and prevent stillbirths by 2025. J Glob Health 2016;6:010508.
    1. Darmstadt GL, Shiffman J, Lawn JE. Advancing the newborn and stillbirth global agenda: priorities for the next decade. Arch Dis Child 2015;100 (Suppl 1):S13-8.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castano F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann 2012;43:93-114.
    1. Cofer FG, Fridman M, Lawton E, Korst LM, Nicholas L, Gregory KD. Interpregnancy interval and childbirth outcomes in California, 2007-2009. Matern Child Health J 2016;20 (Suppl 1):43-51.
    1. Shachar BZ, Mayo JA, Lyell DJ, Baer RJ, Jeliffe-Pawlowski LL, Stevenson DK, et al. Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2016;123:2009-17.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources