Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jul;12(7):654-657.
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016221. Epub 2020 May 7.

A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials - special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials - special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond

Ansaar T Rai et al. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Enrollment in time-sensitive endovascular stroke trials can be challenging because of an inability to consent a debilitated patient. Often the legally authorized representative is not on site. Remote consent procedures in the US are inconsistent with the majority of sites shunning these approaches. The current pandemic with visitor restrictions highlights the need for enhancing these options.

Methods: Remote electronic and phone consent procedures specifically for endovascular stroke trials from two comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) are presented. An overview of the genesis of informed consent procedures in the US is also included.

Results: The two CSCs identified as Institution-1 and Institution-2 are large tertiary systems. Institution-1 is a non-profit university-affiliated academic medical center in rural geography. Institution-2 is an HCA hospital in an urban environment. Both serve patients through a spoke-and-hub network, have participated in multiple randomized endovascular stroke trials, and have successfully used these remote options for enrollment. A tiered approach is employed at both institutions with an emphasis on obtaining informed consent in person and resorting to alternatives methods when efforts to that are unsuccessful. A rationale for electronic and phone consent is included, followed by step-by-step illustration of the process at each institution.

Conclusion: Two examples of remote electronic or phone consent procedures from institutions in different geographic environments and organization structures demonstrate that these options can be successfully used for enrollment in stroke trials. The current pandemic highlights the need to enhance these approaches while maintaining appropriate adherence to ethical and legal frameworks.

Keywords: stroke; thrombectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A sample of a one-page consent form script is presented: study related information has been redacted.

References

    1. Protection of human subjects; Belmont report: notice of report for public comment. Fed Regist 1979;44:23191–7. - PubMed
    1. Perrenoud B, Velonaki V-S, Bodenmann P, et al. . The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015;13:82–94. 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Protection of human subjects; informed consent – FDA. Final rule. Fed Regist 1996;61:51498–533. - PubMed
    1. New guidance on electronic informed consent. Cancer Discov 2017;7:OF4. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2017-008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ernst AA, Fish S. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards – balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:1050–5. 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.015 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms