Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 May 7;10(1):7719.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64164-4.

Pregnancy rates after slow-release insemination (SRI) and standard bolus intrauterine insemination (IUI) - A multicentre randomised, controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnancy rates after slow-release insemination (SRI) and standard bolus intrauterine insemination (IUI) - A multicentre randomised, controlled trial

Julian Marschalek et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This multicentre, randomised, controlled cross-over trial was designed to investigate the effect of intra-uterine slow-release insemination (SRI) on pregnancy rates in women with confirmed infertility or the need for semen donation who were eligible for standard bolus intra-uterine insemination (IUI). Data for a total of 182 women were analysed after randomisation to receive IUI (n = 96) or SRI (n = 86) first. The primary outcome was serological pregnancy defined by a positive beta human chorionic gonadotropin test, two weeks after insemination. Patients who did not conceive after the first cycle switched to the alternative technique for the second cycle: 44 women switched to IUI and 58 switched to SRI. In total, there were 284 treatment cycles (IUI: n = 140; SRI: n = 144). Pregnancy rates following SRI and IUI were 13.2% and 10.0%, respectively, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.202). A statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates for SRI versus IUI was detected in women aged under 35 years. In this subgroup, the pregnancy rate with SRI was 17% compared to 7% with IUI (relative risk 2.33; p = 0.032) across both cycles. These results support the hypothesis that the pregnancy rate might be improved with SRI compared to standard bolus IUI, especially in women aged under 35 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.M., C.E., E.V.-B., J.O., M.F., Mv.S. and P.H. received payments on behalf of their institutions for each treatment performed under the study agreement and further benefited from the statistical analysis and editorial support provided by the sponsor but report no other conflicts of interest. J.C. received payment from the sponsor as an independent statistical consultant but reports no other conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic Illustration of the EVIE Slow Release Insemination Pump. (Figure by courtesy of Fertiligent Ltd.).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart showing the initial randomisation to IUI or SRI, pregnancy rates and numbers of patients crossing over to the alternate procedure. (IUI, intrauterine insemination; SRI, slow-release insemination).

References

    1. Luke B. Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2017;217:270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantineau AE, Janssen MJ, Cohlen BJ, Allersma T. Synchronised approach for intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;12:CD006942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006942.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soria M, et al. Pregnancy predictors after intrauterine insemination: analysis of 3012 cycles in 1201 couples. Journal of reproduction & infertility. 2012;13:158–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gomez R, et al. The effect of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of intrauterine insemination. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2014;289:181–185. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2952-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemmens L, et al. Techniques used for IUI: is it time for a change? Human reproduction. 2017;32:1835–1845. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex223. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances