Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;23(12):2145-2154.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980019005147. Epub 2020 May 8.

Correlates of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among adolescents

Affiliations

Correlates of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among adolescents

Dominique Beaulieu et al. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To identify correlates and underlying beliefs regarding the adolescents' intention to abstain from consuming sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and the consumption of ≤1 daily portion of SSB.

Design: Correlational study.

Setting: Region of Chaudière-Appalaches in the province of Quebec, Canada.

Participants: 311 adolescents aged 13-18 years completed a self-administrated online questionnaire based on the Reasoned Action Approach. Frequency and quantity of different types of SSB within the past month were measured.

Results: Total mean SSB intake was 882·6 ml/d (654·0 kJ/d ). Only 11·3 % abstained from SSB within the last month. Intention to abstain from SSB was explained by identification as SSB abstainers (β = 0·47), perceived norm (β = 0·32), attitude (β = 0·30), age 13-14 years (β = -0·27) and perception of the school environment (β = 0·14), which explained 66 % of the variance. Consumption of ≤1 daily portion of SSB was explained by the intention to abstain (OR = 1·55; 95 % CI 1·14, 2·11), perceived behavioural control to abstain (OR = 1·80; 95 % CI 1·29, 2·52), sex (girls v. boys: OR = 2·34; 95 % CI 1·37, 3·98) and socio-economic status (advantaged v. disadvantaged school: OR = 2·08; 95 % CI 1·21, 3·56). Underlying beliefs (i.e. more energy, decreased risk of addiction and friends' approval) associated with intention as well as perceived barriers (e.g. access to SSB, after an activity that makes you thirsty), and facilitating factors (e.g. access to water) linked to SSB consumption were identified.

Conclusions: The results can inform public health interventions to decrease SSB consumption and their associated health problems among adolescents.

Keywords: Adolescents; Beliefs; Intention; Reasoned action approach; School environment; Sugar-sweetened beverages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Theoretical framework (adapted from Fishbein and Ajzen(23))

References

    1. CDC (2010) The CDC Guide to Strategies for Reducing the Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. Atlanta, GA: CDC.
    1. Malik VS, Schulze MB & Hu FB (2006) Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 274–288. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bleich SN & Vercammen KA (2018) The negative impact of sugar-sweetened beverages on children’s health: an update of the literature. BMC Obes 5, 6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA et al. (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation 121, 1356–1364. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z et al. (2015) Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ 351, h3576. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types