Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204315.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4315.

Association of Participation in an End-of-Life Conversation Game With Advance Care Planning Behavior and Perspectives Among African American Individuals

Lauren Jodi Van Scoy  1   2   3 , Benjamin H Levi  2   4 , Pamela Witt  1 , Cindy Bramble  5 , Christopher Richardson  5 , Irene Putzig  5 , A Rose Levi  1 , Emily Wasserman  3 , Vernon Chinchilli  3 , Amy Tucci  5 , Michael J Green  1   2
Affiliations

Association of Participation in an End-of-Life Conversation Game With Advance Care Planning Behavior and Perspectives Among African American Individuals

Lauren Jodi Van Scoy et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Less than 25% of African American individuals have completed advance directives and are thus vulnerable to poor end-of-life care. Low-cost interventions are needed to increase engagement in advance care planning (ACP).

Objectives: To investigate whether an end-of-life conversation game motivates African American attendees to engage in ACP and to assess whether the game is well received and endorsed.

Exposures: Attendance at an end-of-life conversation game (Hello) played in groups of 4 to 6 participants for 60 minutes.

Design, setting, and participants: Prospective, mixed-methods cohort study conducted from 2018 to 2019 with a 3- to 11-month follow-up interview. Game events were held in 53 community venues across the US; 15 were purposively sampled for onsite research procedures. Of 428 attendees at purposively sampled sites, 386 (90%) consented to research procedures (6 attendees were removed from analysis for protocol deviation). Of 367 attendees who provided accurate contact information, 232 (63%) were contacted, and 220 were included in follow-up analyses.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was advance directive completion rates after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included rates of other ACP behaviors, ACP engagement, conversation satisfaction and realism, and participants' Net Promoter Score (a measure of endorsement). Follow-up telephone interviews explored the game experience and relevant ACP behaviors of attendees.

Results: Of 380 individuals who participated (mean [SD] age, 62.2 [13.8] years; 304 were female [80%], and 348 were [92%] African American), none withdrew because of an adverse event. After the intervention, 91 of 220 attendees (41%) completed a new advance directive; 176 of 220 attendees (80%) discussed end-of-life wishes with loved ones, and 214 of 219 attendees (98%) completed at least 1 ACP behavior. There was a moderate increase in the self-efficacy domain on the ACP Engagement Survey (mean [SD] change from before to after the game, 0.54 [0.98]; P < .001). The mean (SD) conversation satisfaction score was 6.21 (0.93) (range, 1-7, with 7 being highest satisfaction), and the overall Net Promoter Score was 57.89 (range, -100 to 100, with 100 being highest endorsement). Interviews revealed 5 themes about the game: (1) it was a useful forum for ACP; (2) it provided new information and perspective; (3) it was emotionally beneficial; (4) it increased appreciation for ACP; and (5) it empowered and motivated participants to perform ACP. Mixed-methods integration showed convergence across data sets.

Conclusions and relevance: Among a nationwide sample of African American individuals, the end-of-life conversation game appeared to be well received and was associated with high rates of ACP behavior. This low-cost and scalable tool may help reduce health disparities associated with end-of-life care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Van Scoy reported serving as an unpaid scientific advisor to Common Practice, LLC, which is the company that produces and sells the game used in this study; receiving funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Canadian Institute of Health Research, the Society for Critical Care Medicine, the Francis Family Foundation, and the Association for Clinical Pastoral Education. Dr B. H. Levi reported receiving funding from the National Institute of Nursing Research and the Children’s Miracle Network during the conduct of the study. Drs B. H. Levi and Green reported receiving personal fees as consultants for Vital Decisions, the parent company that owns the electronic version of the advance directive used in this study (My Living Voice). Drs B. H. Levi and Green are the co-creators of the decision aid, Making Your Wishes Known, which was developed for research purposes and continues to be available free of charge. Any research involving Making Your Wishes Known or My Living Voice is monitored by the Institutional Review Board and Conflict of Interest Review Committee of Penn State. Drs Bramble, Richardson, and Putzig reported receiving grants from the Hospice Foundation of America during the conduct of the study. Dr Chinchilli reported receiving funding from the NIH and the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Dr Green reported receiving funding from the NIH. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Participant Flow Diagram of Purposively Sampled Sites
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dying in America Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. The Institute of Medicine; 2014.
    1. LoPresti MA, Dement F, Gold HT. End-of-life care for people with cancer from ethnic minority groups: a systematic review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016;33(3):291-305. doi:10.1177/1049909114565658 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mack JW, Paulk ME, Viswanath K, Prigerson HG. Racial disparities in the outcomes of communication on medical care received near death. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1533-1540. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.322 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Degenholtz HB, Arnold RA, Meisel A, Lave JR. Persistence of racial disparities in advance care plan documents among nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(2):378-381. doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50073.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connor SR, Elwert F, Spence C, Christakis NA. Racial disparity in hospice use in the United States in 2002. Palliat Med. 2008;22(3):205-213. doi:10.1177/0269216308089305 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types