Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 17;7(7):e14536.
doi: 10.2196/14536.

A Digital Intervention for Adolescent Depression (MoodHwb): Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation

Affiliations

A Digital Intervention for Adolescent Depression (MoodHwb): Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation

Rhys Bevan Jones et al. JMIR Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment and prevention guidelines highlight the key role of health information and evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adolescent depression. Digital health technologies and psychoeducational interventions have been recommended to help engage young people and to provide accurate health information, enhance self-management skills, and promote social support. However, few digital psychoeducational interventions for adolescent depression have been robustly developed and evaluated in line with research guidance.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact of a theory-informed, co-designed digital intervention program, MoodHwb.

Methods: We used a mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) approach to evaluate the program and the assessment process. Adolescents with or at elevated risk of depression and their parents and carers were recruited from mental health services, school counselors and nurses, and participants from a previous study. They completed a range of questionnaires before and after the program (related to the feasibility and acceptability of the program and evaluation process, and changes in mood, knowledge, attitudes, and behavior), and their Web usage was monitored. A subsample was also interviewed. A focus group was conducted with professionals from health, education, social, and youth services and charities. Interview and focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis with NVivo 10 (QSR International Pty Ltd).

Results: A total of 44 young people and 31 parents or carers were recruited, of which 36 (82%) young people and 21 (68%) parents or carers completed follow-up questionnaires. In all, 19 young people and 12 parents or carers were interviewed. Overall, 13 professionals from a range of disciplines participated in the focus group. The key themes from the interviews and groups related to the design features, sections and content, and integration and context of the program in the young person's life. Overall, the participants found the intervention engaging, clear, user-friendly, and comprehensive, and stated that it could be integrated into existing services. Young people found the "Self help" section and "Mood monitor" particularly helpful. The findings provided initial support for the intervention program theory, for example, depression literacy improved after using the intervention (difference in mean literacy score: 1.7, 95% CI 0.8 to 2.6; P<.001 for young people; 1.3, 95% CI 0.4 to 2.2; P=.006 for parents and carers).

Conclusions: Findings from this early stage evaluation suggest that MoodHwb and the assessment process were feasible and acceptable, and that the intervention has the potential to be helpful for young people, families and carers as an early intervention program in health, education, social, and youth services and charities. A randomized controlled trial is needed to further evaluate the digital program.

Keywords: adolescent; depression; early medical intervention; education; feasibility study; internet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MoodHwb welcome screen (main image/left) and open menu (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of subsections from the “Possible reasons (for low mood)” and “Where to get help” sections.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interactive elements: mood monitor and diary (left); “Stuff I like” (top center); goal setting (bottom center); dashboard/profile section (right).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart of participants in the quantitative evaluation phase.

References

    1. Thapar A, Collishaw S, Pine DS, Thapar AK. Depression in adolescence. Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1056–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60871-4. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22305766 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. North West Clinical Senates. London: Department of Health; 2009. [2020-03-23]. New Horizons: Towards a Shared Vision for Mental Health https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130104235147/http://www.dh.....
    1. Thapar A, Collishaw S, Potter R, Thapar AK. Managing and preventing depression in adolescents. Br Med J. 2010 Jan 22;340:c209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c209. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett C, Bevan Jones R, Smith D. Prevention strategies for adolescent depression. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2014 Mar;20(2):116–24. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.112.010314. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.112.010314. - DOI - DOI
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Depression in children and young people: Identification and management. London: NICE Clinical Guideline; 2019. - PubMed