Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0232082.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232082. eCollection 2020.

Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept

Affiliations

Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept

Bram Thiel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Main outcome: Thirty patients (60%) found it satisfying or very satisfying to communicate their pain with the app. Pain experienced after surgery was scored by patients as 'no': 3 (6%), 'little': 5 (10%), 'bearable': 25 (50%), 'considerable': 13 (26%) and 'severe': 1 (2%). Forty-five patients (90%) were positive about the ease of recording. Forty-five patients (90%) could correctly record their pain with the app. Thirty-eight patients (76%) agreed that in-app notifications to record pain were useful. Two patients (4%) were too ill to use the application. Based on usability feedback, we will redesign the pain intensity wheel and the in-app pain chart to improve clarity for patients to understand the course of their pain.

Secondary outcomes: The median patient recorded pain app score 4.0 (range 0 to 10) and nurse recorded numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain NRS 4.0 (range 0 to 9) were not statistically different (p = 0.06). Forty-two percent from a total of 307 patient pain app scores were ≥ 5 (on a scale from 0 no pain at all to 10 worst imaginable pain). Of these, 83% were recorded as 'bearable' while only in 18% of the recordings patients asked for additional analgesia. The results suggest that self-recording the severity of postoperative pain by patients with a smartphone application could be useful for postoperative pain management. The application was perceived as user-friendly and had high satisfaction rates from both patients and stakeholders. Further research is needed to validate the 11-point numeric and faces pain scale with the current gold standards visual analogue scale (VAS) and NRS for pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Rover A.A.M. van Mierlo is employee at Logicapps the company that built the application commissioned by OLVG. OLVG and Logicapps have no commercial interest in the application. The application is available free of charge for patients. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Home screen: My pain score.
Fig 2
Fig 2
A. additional pain question: Is the pain bearable?. B. PAIN app additional pain question: Is extra pain relief required?. C. PAIN app additional pain question: Contact the nurse?.
Fig 3
Fig 3. In-app pain chart.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Patient recruitment flowchart.

References

    1. Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, et al. Assessment of pain. British journal of anaesthesia. 2008;101(1):17–24. 10.1093/bja/aen103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meissner W, Ullrich K, Zwacka S. Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in postoperative pain management. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2006;23(2):142–8. 10.1017/S026502150500205X - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Dijk JF, van Wijck AJ, Kappen TH, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Schuurmans MJ. Postoperative pain assessment based on numeric ratings is not the same for patients and professionals: a cross-sectional study. International journal of nursing studies. 2012;49(1):65–71. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Dijk JF, Vervoort SC, van Wijck AJ, Kalkman CJ, Schuurmans MJ. Postoperative patients' perspectives on rating pain: A qualitative study. International journal of nursing studies. 2016;53:260–9. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Boekel RL, Steegers MA, de Blok C, Schilp J. [Pain registration: for the benefit of the inspectorate or the patient?]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2014;158:A7723 - PubMed

Publication types