Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
- PMID: 32384103
- PMCID: PMC7209286
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232082
Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept
Abstract
Main outcome: Thirty patients (60%) found it satisfying or very satisfying to communicate their pain with the app. Pain experienced after surgery was scored by patients as 'no': 3 (6%), 'little': 5 (10%), 'bearable': 25 (50%), 'considerable': 13 (26%) and 'severe': 1 (2%). Forty-five patients (90%) were positive about the ease of recording. Forty-five patients (90%) could correctly record their pain with the app. Thirty-eight patients (76%) agreed that in-app notifications to record pain were useful. Two patients (4%) were too ill to use the application. Based on usability feedback, we will redesign the pain intensity wheel and the in-app pain chart to improve clarity for patients to understand the course of their pain.
Secondary outcomes: The median patient recorded pain app score 4.0 (range 0 to 10) and nurse recorded numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain NRS 4.0 (range 0 to 9) were not statistically different (p = 0.06). Forty-two percent from a total of 307 patient pain app scores were ≥ 5 (on a scale from 0 no pain at all to 10 worst imaginable pain). Of these, 83% were recorded as 'bearable' while only in 18% of the recordings patients asked for additional analgesia. The results suggest that self-recording the severity of postoperative pain by patients with a smartphone application could be useful for postoperative pain management. The application was perceived as user-friendly and had high satisfaction rates from both patients and stakeholders. Further research is needed to validate the 11-point numeric and faces pain scale with the current gold standards visual analogue scale (VAS) and NRS for pain.
Conflict of interest statement
We have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Rover A.A.M. van Mierlo is employee at Logicapps the company that built the application commissioned by OLVG. OLVG and Logicapps have no commercial interest in the application. The application is available free of charge for patients. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Figures
References
-
- van Dijk JF, van Wijck AJ, Kappen TH, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Schuurmans MJ. Postoperative pain assessment based on numeric ratings is not the same for patients and professionals: a cross-sectional study. International journal of nursing studies. 2012;49(1):65–71. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- van Boekel RL, Steegers MA, de Blok C, Schilp J. [Pain registration: for the benefit of the inspectorate or the patient?]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2014;158:A7723 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
