Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;86(9):1736-1752.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.14352. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

Immune checkpoint blockade in solid organ tumours: Choice, dose and predictors of response

Affiliations
Review

Immune checkpoint blockade in solid organ tumours: Choice, dose and predictors of response

Vishal Navani et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed outcomes across solid organ tumours. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the negative inhibitory cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed-death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 axis can lead to deep and durable responses across several tumour streams in the advanced setting. This immunotherapy approach is increasingly used earlier in the treatment paradigm. A rapidly evolving regulatory, reimbursement and drug development landscape has accompanied this novel class of immunotherapy. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients respond meaningfully to these agents. Here we review how the underlying tumoural genomic, histological and immunological characteristics interact within various patient phenotypes, leading to variations in response to checkpoint blockade. Concurrently, we outline the clinical trial and real-world evidence that allows for appropriate selection of agent, dose and schedule in solid organ malignancies. An exploration of current trends in basic and translational research in immune checkpoint blockade accompanies a commentary on future clinical directions for checkpoint blockade in oncology.

Keywords: checkpoint blockade; cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4; genotype; immunotherapy; pharmacology, phenotype; programmed death 1; programmed death-ligand 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

V.N.: travel (domestic): MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb. N.B.: research funding (investigator initiated trial) – Merck KGaA. M.G.: none declared. A.V.W.: travel (international): Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Novartis. Research funding (investigator initiated trial) – Merck KGaA

References

    1. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359(6382):1350‐1355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chambers CA, Kuhns MS, Egen JG, Allison JP. CTLA‐4‐mediated inhibition in regulation of T cell responses: mechanisms and manipulation in tumor immunotherapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19(1):565‐594. - PubMed
    1. Leach DR, Krummel MF, Allison JP. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA‐4 blockade. Science. 1996;271(5256):1734‐1736. - PubMed
    1. Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD‐1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26(1):677‐704. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlino MS, Long GV. Ipilimumab combined with Nivolumab: a standard of Care for the Treatment of advanced melanoma? Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(16):3992‐3998. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances