Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Amputation: What Is Currently Known?
- PMID: 32384319
- DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001164
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Amputation: What Is Currently Known?
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Twelve medication classes on the market reduce serum glucose including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Potential benefits of these agents include improved glycemic control, weight loss, reduction in blood pressure, and possible reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk.
Areas of uncertainty: Recently, several adverse events have been identified including increased possible risk of amputation associated with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy.
Data source: We conducted a review of published literature and identified 32 trials reviewing incidence of SGLT2 inhibitor-related amputation.
Results: The potential increased risk for amputation is mostly of the lower extremities. Of the SGLT2 inhibitors currently available, canagliflozin has the highest association with an increased risk of lower extremity amputation and is the only agent with a Food and drug Administration Black Box Warning. Most canagliflozin amputation occurred in a single study. Risk factors for amputation with SGLT2 inhibitors may include those who have a history of amputations, susceptible to foot ulcers and those with baseline cardiovascular disease.
Conclusions: For at-risk patients who desire an agent from this drug class, empagliflozin or dapagliflozin should be considered, as studies have not found a significant increase in amputations when compared with placebo or in retrospective reviews. Despite the increased risk of amputation found with canagliflozin, providers can use SGLT2 inhibitors with frequent monitoring to safely manage diabetes in low-risk patients. Patient education on associated risks is warranted. Diabetes educators can inform patients of risk factors to assist with monitoring.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes. Vol 83: World Health Organization; 2016. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204871. Accessed February 10, 2019.
-
- Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, et al. Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015;314:1021–1029.
-
- Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(suppl 1):S111–S134.
-
- Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(suppl 1):S98–S110.
-
- Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the american diabetes association (ADA) and the european association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41:2669–2701.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials