Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;36(8):384-388.
doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002116.

The Utility of a Travel Screen at Triage in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

David Greenky  1 , Scott Gillespie  1 , Aly Levine  2 , Brittany Murray
Affiliations

The Utility of a Travel Screen at Triage in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

David Greenky et al. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The travel screen was implemented by emergency departments (EDs) across the country in 2014 to detect patients exposed to Ebola early and prevent local outbreaks. It remains part of the triage protocol in many EDs to detect communicable disease from abroad and has become a defacto screen for other travel-related illness. Its utility has not been studied in the pediatric ED.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of electronic medical records across 3 EDs from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. The screening question reads, "Has the child or a close contact of the child traveled outside the United States in the past 21 days?" A follow-up question requesting travel details is included for positive screens. We compared length of stay, return-visit rates, and differences in disposition between patients with positive and negative travel screens using generalized linear regression. Matched regression estimates, 95% confidence intervals, and P values were reported.

Results: The study population included 152,945 patients with a total of 322,229 encounters in 2016, of which 232,787 encounters had a travel screen documented during triage. There were 2258 patient encounters that had positive travel screens. Only 201 (8.9%) of these encounters had further description of the travel in the comments box. The odds of hospital admission for patients with positive travel screens were 1.76 (95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.01; P < 0.001) times the odds of hospital admission for patients screened negative. The significance of this finding was largely driven by general hospital admission. Other metrics did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions: Although a positive travel screen was mildly predictive of inpatient admission, information is not available to providers about travel-related risk. Recent literature suggests integrating a travel history with presenting symptoms and region of travel and could produce a more specific travel screen. A revised travel screen should be implemented and studied in the pediatric ED.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Identify, isolate, inform: emergency department evaluation and management for patients under investigation (PUIs) for Ebola virus disease (EVD). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/emergency-services/emergency-.... Accessed February 28, 2020.
    1. World Tourism Organization. International Tourism Highlights, 2019 Edition. Available at: https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284421152. Accessed February 28, 2020.
    1. Wu HM. Evaluation of the sick returned traveler. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019;36:197–202.
    1. Yaffee AQ, Isakov A, Wu HM. How can emergency departments better prepare for emerging infectious disease threats? A returned traveler with fever walks into triage. J Emerg Med. 2019;56:568–570.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Infectious disease outbreaks, epidemics, and bioterrorism/environmental health emergencies. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/proresources_id_outbreaks.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2020. Chemical-.