Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 May;6(1):e001174.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001174.

Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland

Affiliations
Observational Study

Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland

A Finckh et al. RMD Open. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background: Multiple biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are approved for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including TNF inhibitors (TNFi), bDMARDs with other modes of action (bDMARD-OMA) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Combination of b/tsDMARDs with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) is recommended, yet monotherapy is common in practice.

Objective: To compare drug maintenance and clinical effectiveness of three alternative treatment options for RA management.

Methods: This observational cohort study was nested within the Swiss RA Registry. TNFi, bDMARD-OMA (abatacept or anti-IL6 agents) or the JAKi tofacitinib (Tofa) initiated in adult RA patients were included. The primary outcome was overall drug retention. We further analysed secondary effectiveness outcomes and whether concomitant csDMARDs modified effectiveness, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Results: 4023 treatment courses of 2600 patients were included, 1862 on TNFi, 1355 on bDMARD-OMA and 806 on Tofa. TNFi was more frequently used as a first b/tsDMARDs, at a younger age and with shorter disease duration. Overall drug maintenance was significantly lower with TNFi compared with Tofa [HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.47)], but similar between bDMARD-OMA and Tofa [HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.24)]. TNFi maintenance was decreased when prescribed without concomitant csDMARDs [HR: 1.27 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.49)], while no difference was observed for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa maintenance with respect to concomitant csDMARDs.

Conclusion: Tofa drug maintenance was comparable with bDMARDs-OMA and somewhat higher than TNFi. Concomitant csDMARDs appear to be required for optimal effectiveness of TNFi, but not for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa.

Keywords: abatacept; biological therapies; comparative effectiveness research; rheumatoid arthritis; tocilizumab; tumour necrosis alpha inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Yes, there are competing interests for one or more authors and I have provided a Competing Interests statement in my manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Drug discontinuation for any reason in patients with RA on TNFi, bDMARD-OMA and Tofa. TNFi=TNF inhibitors. OMA=bDMARDs with other modes of action (abatacept and anti–IL6 receptor), Tofa=Tofacitinib. Adjusted survival curves based on 4023 treatment courses with 2103 events, representing the average patient in the SCQM population: a female seropositive, non-smoking patients with one prior b/tsDMARD, a female seropositive, non-smoking patient with one prior b/tsDMARD, mean age of 57, disease duration of 10.5 years, baseline DAS28 of 3.7, BMI of 26, who initiated her treatment before the launch of a second JAKi. (A) The median (95% CI) drug maintenance in years for the selected combination of covariates was: Tofa: 1.86 (1.52 to 2.3), OMA: 1.69 (1.48 to 2.1) and TNF: 1.32 (1.15 to 1.6) years. The multiple adjusted HRs of drug discontinuation was: HROMA versus Tofa=1.09 (0.97 to 1.24), HRTNF versus Tofa=1.29 (1.14 to1.47). The overall p-value for treatment effect was <0.001. Tofa 397 events, OMA bDMARD 689 events and TNFi 1017 events. (B) The multiple adjusted HRs of drug discontinuation due to ineffectiveness was: HRTNF versus Tofa=1.59 (1.33 to 1.89) and HROMA versus Tofa=1.19 (0.99 to 1.43). Tofa 183 events, OMA bDMARD 347 events and TNFi 580 events. (C) The multiple adjusted HRs of drug discontinuation due to intolerance and adverse events was: HROMA versus Tofa=0.74 (0.58 to 0.96), HRTNF versus Tofa=0.76 (0.59 to 0.98). Tofa 126 events, OMA bDMARD 191 events and TNFi 199 events. The difference in the total of events of panel A and the sum of events due to insufficient effectiveness or safety from panels B and C is due to discontinuation events due to ‘other’ reasons, which are not represented.
Figure 2
Figure 2
TNFi=TNF inhibitors. OMA=biologic with other modes of action (abatacept and anti-IL-6 receptor), Tofa=tofacitinib. Adjusted survival curves based on 4023 treatment courses with 2103 events, representing the average patient in the SCQM population: a female seropositive, non-smoking patients with one prior b/tsDMARD, mean age of 57, disease duration of 10.5 years, baseline DAS28 of 3.7, BMI of 26, who initiated her treatment before the launch of a second JAKi. The median (95% CI) retention time in years for this selected combination of covariates was: For TNFi: HR-MONO: 1.27 (1.08 to 1.49); for bDMARDs-OMA: HR-MONO versus COMBO: 1.03 (0.89 to 1.20); for Tofa 1.11 (0.91 to 1.35), respectively.

References

    1. Courvoisier D, Mongin D, Hetland M, et al. . FRI0110 The impact of seropositivity on the effectiveness of abatacept versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Real life data from several european registries (THE PAN-ABA STUDY). Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:599–600.
    1. Lauper K, Nordstrom DC, Pavelka K, et al. . Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab versus TNF inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after the use of at least one biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug: analyses from the pan-European TOCERRA register collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1276–82.10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212845 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gabay C, Riek M, Scherer A, et al. . Effectiveness of biologic DMARDs in monotherapy versus in combination with synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Swiss clinical quality management registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54:1664–7210.1093/rheumatology/kev019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buckley F, Finckh A, Huizinga TW, et al. . Comparative efficacy of novel DMARDs as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a network meta-analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2015;21:409–23.10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.5.409 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uitz E, Fransen J, Langenegger T, et al. . Clinical quality management in rheumatoid arthritis: putting theory into practice. Swiss clinical quality management in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:542–9.10.1093/rheumatology/39.5.542 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms