Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;16(1):86-93.
doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.128. Epub 2020 May 11.

Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on the Performance of Emergency Pediatric Procedures by Prehospital Providers

Affiliations

Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on the Performance of Emergency Pediatric Procedures by Prehospital Providers

Maybelle Kou et al. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn by prehospital providers (PHPs) for protection from hazardous exposures. Evidence regarding the ability of PHPs to perform resuscitation procedures has been described in adult but not pediatric models. This study examined the effects of PPE on the ability of PHPs to perform resuscitation procedures on pediatric patients.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted at a US simulation center. Paramedics wore normal attire at the baseline session and donned full Level B PPE for the second session. During each session, they performed timed sets of psychomotor tasks simulating clinical care of a critically ill pediatric patient. The difference in time to completion between baseline and PPE sessions per task was examined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: A total of 50 paramedics completed both sessions. Median times for task completion at the PPE sessions increased significantly from baseline for several procedures: tracheal intubation (+4.5 s; P = 0.01), automated external defibrillator (AED) placement (+9.5 s; P = 0.01), intraosseous line insertion (+7 s; P < 0.0001), tourniquet (+8.5 s; P < 0.0001), intramuscular injection (+21-23 s, P < 0.0001), and pulse oximetry (+4 s; P < 0.0001). There was no significant increase in completion time for bag-mask ventilation or autoinjector use.

Conclusions: PPE did not have a significant impact on PHPs performing critical tasks while caring for a pediatric patient with a highly infectious or chemical exposure. This information may guide PHPs faced with the situation of resuscitating children while wearing Level B PPE.

Keywords: pediatric patients; personal protective equipment; prehospital providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study Design.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection prevention and control recommendations for hospitalized patients under investigation (PUIs) for Ebola virus disease (EVD) in U.S. hospitals. https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/hospitals/infection-control..... Accessed September 17, 2018.
    1. World Health Organization. Interim infection prevention and control guidance for care of patients with suspected or confirmed Filovirus haemorrhagic fever in health care settings, with focus on Ebola. September 2014. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/268772/Interim-Infec.... Accessed September 17, 2018.
    1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA best practices for hospital-based first receivers of victims from mass casualty incidents involving the release of hazardous substances. January 2005. Table 3. https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/bestpractices/html/hospital_firstreceivers.... Accessed March 14, 2020.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Chemical hazards emergency medical management. Personal protective equipment. https://chemm.nlm.nih.gov/ppe.htm. Accessed March 14, 2020.
    1. Coates MJ, Jundi AS, James MR. Chemical protective clothing; a study into the ability of staff to perform lifesaving procedures. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000;17:115-118. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types