Routine Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Is Not Justified by the Clinical Trial Evidence
- PMID: 32389443
- PMCID: PMC8327360
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.016
Routine Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Is Not Justified by the Clinical Trial Evidence
Abstract
Guidelines now recommend multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before prostate biopsy in the work-up for patients with elevated prostate specific-antigen. However, use of magnetic resonance imaging for early detection of prostate cancer is not justified by the clinical trial evidence.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Platinum Opinion Counterview: The Evidence Base for the Benefit of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Prostate Cancer Diagnosis is Sound.Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):307-309. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32540172 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Olivier Rouvière, and Theodorus van der Kwast's Letter to the Editor re: Andrew Vickers, Sigrid V. Carlsson, Matthew Cooperberg. Routine Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Is Not Justified by the Clinical Trial Evidence. Eur Urol 2020;78:304-6. Prebiopsy MRI: Through the Looking Glass.Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):314-315. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jul 4. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32631742 No abstract available.
-
Re: Andrew Vickers, Sigrid V. Carlsson, Matthew Cooperberg. Routine Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Is Not Justified by the Clinical Trial Evidence. Eur Urol 2020;78:304-6: Prebiopsy MRI: Through the Looking Glass.Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):310-313. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 11. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32660749 No abstract available.
-
Re: Andrew Vickers, Sigrid V. Carlsson, Matthew Cooperberg. Routine Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Is Not Justified by the Clinical Trial Evidence. Eur Urol 2020;78:304-6.Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):e14-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 26. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33121827 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Yi Sun, Fengxiang Sun, Qiang Wei, Jin Huang, and Ruiqi Duan's Letter to the Editor re: Andrew Vickers, Sigrid V. Carlsson, Matthew Cooperberg. Routine Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Is Not Justified by the Clinical Trial Evidence. Eur Urol 2020;78:304-6.Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):e16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33153816 No abstract available.
References
-
- Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on prostate cancer. https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/ - PubMed
-
- Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 2017;389:815–22. - PubMed
-
- Fulgham PF, Rukstalis DB, Rubenstein JN, et al. Standard operating procedure for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis, staging and management of prostate cancer: a collaborative initiative by the American Urological Association and the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease Focus Panel. American Urological Association/Society of Abdominal Radiology; 2019. www.auanet.org/guidelines/mri-ofthe-prostate-sop
