Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;29(12):1982-1987.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5409. Epub 2020 May 26.

Framework for planning the delivery of psychosocial oncology services: An American psychosocial oncology society task force report

William F Pirl  1   2 , Joseph A Greer  2   3 , Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio  4 , Teresa Deshields  5 , Scott Irwin  6 , Karen Fasciano  1   2 , Lori Wiener  7 , Tiffany Courtnage  8 , Lynne S Padgett  9 , Jesse R Fann  8   10
Affiliations

Framework for planning the delivery of psychosocial oncology services: An American psychosocial oncology society task force report

William F Pirl et al. Psychooncology. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: While screening for psychosocial distress is now the standard of care in oncology, little guidance is available on how best to deliver services in response to identified needs. The American Psychosocial Oncology Society (APOS) convened a task force with the goal of creating a framework that could aid in planning services and justifying requests for resources.

Methods: Ten experts from multiple disciplines within psychosocial oncology served on the task force, first meeting together as a larger group over 2 days to set an agenda and then subsequently working in smaller teams to execute the goals. The task force used consensus methods for developing recommendations.

Results: Three principles were identified for the framework. First, psychosocial oncology is a key component of population health, and population-based approaches to care delivery are required. Second, several key parameters shape psychosocial oncology services: resources, aims, and scope. To guide resource allocation, example priorities were identified for the aims and scope of services. Finally, cancer care centers should strive to ensure the delivery of high-quality psychosocial oncology care across all components of care. A range of practices was ranked by their potential contributions to achieving that goal.

Conclusions: This framework may aid in planning, evaluating, and refining the delivery of responsive psychosocial oncology services.

Keywords: health services; healthcare delivery; psychosocial oncology services.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Cancer Program Standards: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care Manual (2016 Edition). Standard 3.2 - Psychosocial Distress Screening, pp. 56–57. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Distress management clinical practice guidelines in oncology version 1. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx. Published 2017. Accessed 2019.
    1. Andersen BL, DeRubeis RJ, Berman BS, et al. Screening, assessment, and care of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline adaptation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15):1605–1619. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deshields T, Zebrack B, Kennedy V. The state of psychosocial services in cancer care in the United States. Psychooncology. 2013;22(3):699–703. - PubMed
    1. Deshields T, Kracen A, Nanna S, Kimbro L. Psychosocial staffing at National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions: data from leading cancer centers. Psycho-Oncology. 2015;25(2):164–169. - PubMed

Publication types