Quantifying and Describing the Natural History and Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Effects of Hypothetical Interventions
- PMID: 32390617
- PMCID: PMC7369101
- DOI: 10.3233/JAD-191055
Quantifying and Describing the Natural History and Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Effects of Hypothetical Interventions
Erratum in
-
Quantifying and Describing the Natural History and Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Effects of Hypothetical Interventions.J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(2):905. doi: 10.3233/JAD-219002. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021. PMID: 33749659 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: A long-term horizon is necessary when the socioeconomic consequences and the potential effects of interventions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are estimated.
Objectives: To illustrate the potential societal costs of AD across the disease continuum and to illustrate the potential cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention with disease modifying treatment (DMT).
Methods: Based on the Swedish dementia registry, a Markov model was used to simulate a virtual cohort of 100,000 people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (AD-MCI) in Sweden for 40 years starting at the age of 60. A simulated hypothetical intervention assumed a 25% reduction in progression rate during AD-MCI and mild AD-dementia. A comprehensive set of sensitivity analyses was included.
Results: The cumulative risk to develop dementia was 96%. The mean simulated survival was 19.0 years. The net present value for a person year with dementia was 252,843 SEK (about 29,500 US$). The cost effectiveness model illustrated how the hypothetical scenario of a 25% reduction in progression to AD-dementia would require 41 AD-MCI patients to be treated to prevent one case of AD-dementia (2,447 avoided AD-dementia cases of 100,000 with AD-MCI). Most scenarios illustrated hypothetical cost effectiveness (based on a willingness to pay level of 600,000 SEK (70,000 US$) per gained QALY), but not cost savings.
Discussion: Lifetime societal costs of AD are substantial. A future DMT may be potentially cost-effective given assumed treatment effects and costs, but cost savings are unlikely.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; cost analysis; cost effectiveness; costs; dementia; disease-modifying treatment; economics.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors’ disclosures available online (
Figures
References
-
- Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, Wu Y-T, Prina M (2015) World Alzheimer Report 2015. The Global Impact of Dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London.
-
- WHO (2012) Dementia: A public health priority, WHO, Geneva.
-
- WHO, Seventieth World Health Assembly update, 29 May 2017,WHO, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/dementia-immunization-..., Accessed 2017-11-06.
-
- Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S, Ballard C, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Cedazo-Minguez A, Dubois B, Edvardsson D, Feldman H, Fratiglioni L, Frisoni GB, Gauthier S, Georges J, Graff C, Iqbal K, Jessen F, Johansson G, Jonsson L, Kivipelto M, Knapp M, Mangialasche F, Melis R, Nordberg A, Rikkert MO, Qiu C, Sakmar TP, Scheltens P, Schneider LS, Sperling R, Tjernberg LO, Waldemar G, Wimo A, Zetterberg H (2016) Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: A priority for European science and society, Lancet Neurol 15, 455–532. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
