Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May;34(2):114-119.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709143. Epub 2020 May 6.

Prosthetic Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Palate

Affiliations
Review

Prosthetic Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Palate

Christopher Pool et al. Semin Plast Surg. 2020 May.

Abstract

Maxillary defects commonly present following surgical resection of oncologic processes. The use of rotational and free flaps has largely replaced the use of prosthetic options for hard palate and maxillary reconstruction, but prostheses remain a useful tool. Prosthetic devices may be invaluable in patients considered poor candidates for surgical reconstruction secondary to poor vascularity, need for postoperative radiation, or medical comorbidities that place them at high risk for healing following reconstruction. Obturators may also be considered over soft tissue options if oncologic surveillance via direct visualization of the surgical site is warranted.

Keywords: craniofacial; facial reconstruction; maxilla; prosthesis; prosthetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Maxillectomy defect classification. (Adapted with permission from Brown et al. 1 )
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of prefabricated surgical obturators. (Reproduced with permission from Haug. 13 )
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
( A ) Cast with proposed margins outlined. ( B ) Prepared cast for fabrication of obturator. (Reproduced with permission from Shah et al. 27 )
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
( A ) Interim obturator with cusps around teeth. ( B ) Interim prosthesis with the obturator portion formed from resilient lining material (white). (Reproduced with permission from Shah et al. 27 )
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Custom ring tray on framework. (Reproduced with permission from Haug. 13 )
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Soft palate speech bulb prosthesis. (Reproduced with permission from Shah et al. 27 )

References

    1. Brown J S, Rogers S N, McNally D N, Boyle M. A modified classification for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck. 2000;22(01):17–26. - PubMed
    1. Aramany M A. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40(05):554–557. - PubMed
    1. Okay D J, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(04):352–363. - PubMed
    1. Andrades P, Militsakh O, Hanasono M M, Rieger J, Rosenthal E L. Current strategies in reconstruction of maxillectomy defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(08):806–812. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kornblith A B, Zlotolow I M, Gooen J et al. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck. 1996;18(04):323–334. - PubMed