Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;36(7):497-511.
doi: 10.1089/jop.2020.0014. Epub 2020 May 8.

Loteprednol Etabonate for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Affiliations
Review

Loteprednol Etabonate for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Kenneth Beckman et al. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition that can impair vision and may adversely impact quality of life. Due to the inflammatory nature of this disorder, topical corticosteroids are an effective treatment option, particularly for moderate-to-severe DED when first-line treatments, such as ocular lubricants, are insufficient. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a retrometabolically designed corticosteroid with a low propensity to cause corticosteroid-related adverse effects, such as elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). This review was conducted to provide an assessment of published studies on the use of LE for treatment of inflammation associated with DED. Twelve prospective and 2 retrospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic suspension 0.5% and 2 prospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% were identified. LE given as monotherapy or with artificial tears (AT) improved signs of DED, especially among patients with a more pronounced inflammatory component, and also improved DED symptoms compared to baseline and/or control. Treatment with LE before cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy reduced stinging upon CsA initiation and provided more rapid relief of DED signs and symptoms than CsA plus AT alone. In patients with meibomian gland dysfunction, LE alone, or in addition to eyelid scrubs/warm compresses, reduced clinical signs and symptoms, and tear proinflammatory cytokine levels. Overall, LE was safe and well tolerated, with minimal effects on IOP. While larger and longer-term studies are warranted, these data support the use of LE as a safe and effective treatment option for DED.

Keywords: dry eye disease; inflammation; intraocular pressure; loteprednol etabonate; ocular surface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K.B. is a consultant for Alcon, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC, Eyevance Pharmaceuticals, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. J.K. is a consultant for Allergan, EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis, and Ocular Science; he served on an ad board with Eyevance Pharmaceuticals, Kala Pharmaceuticals, and Ocular Therapeutix. P.M. is a consultant for Alcon, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC, Bio-Tissue, Inc., Dompé, Eyevance Pharmaceuticals, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Novaliq, Novartis, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. A.R. is a consultant for Alcon, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Changes of Schirmer test (A), TBUT (B), keratoepitheliopathy (C), and symptom score (D) in the LE 0.5% and fluorometholone 0.1% groups. Group A, LE group; Group B, fluorometholone group, *P < 0.05 versus the baseline. From Jung et al. Reproduced without modification under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. LE, loteprednol etabonate; TBUT, tear film breakup time.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Mean ± SEM OSDI scores for LE+tCsA− (n = 57) and AT+tCsA− (n = 55)-treated patients at baseline and at each of the study visits. OSDI scores for LE+tCSA− and AT+tCsA-treated patients at baseline and at each day of the study. *Statistically significant versus baseline, P < 0.05. From Sheppard et al. Reproduced with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health. The Creative Commons license does not apply to this content. Use of the material in any format is prohibited without written permission from the publisher, Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., Please contact permissions@lww.com for further information. AT, artificial tears; OSDI, Ocular Surface Disease Index; SEM, standard error of the mean; tCsA, topical cyclosporine A.

References

    1. Craig J.P., Nichols K.K., Akpek E.K., et al. . TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul. Surf. 15:276–283, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Bron A.J., de Paiva C.S., Chauhan S.K., et al. . TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul. Surf. 15:438–510, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Milner M.S., Beckman K.A., Luchs J.I., et al. . Dysfunctional tear syndrome: dry eye disease and associated tear film disorders—new strategies for diagnosis and treatment. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 27(Suppl 1):3–47, 2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stapleton F., Alves M., Bunya V.Y., et al. . TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul. Surf. 15:334–365, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Farrand K.F., Fridman M., Stillman I.Ö., and Schaumberg D.A.. Prevalence of diagnosed dry eye disease in the United States among adults aged 18 years and older. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 182:90–98, 2017 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources