Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May:4:444-453.
doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00165.

Quantitative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research

Affiliations

Quantitative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research

Andrey Fedorov et al. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 May.

Abstract

Purpose: We summarize Quantitative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research (QIICR; U24 CA180918), one of the first projects funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Informatics Technology for Cancer Research program.

Methods: QIICR was motivated by the 3 use cases from the NCI Quantitative Imaging Network. 3D Slicer was selected as the platform for implementation of open-source quantitative imaging (QI) tools. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) was chosen for standardization of QI analysis outputs. Support of improved integration with community repositories focused on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Priorities included improved capabilities of the standard, toolkits and tools, reference datasets, collaborations, and training and outreach.

Results: Fourteen new tools to support head and neck cancer, glioblastoma, and prostate cancer QI research were introduced and downloaded over 100,000 times. DICOM was amended, with over 40 correction proposals addressing QI needs. Reference implementations of the standard in a popular toolkit and standalone tools were introduced. Eight datasets exemplifying the application of the standard and tools were contributed. An open demonstration/connectathon was organized, attracting the participation of academic groups and commercial vendors. Integration of tools with TCIA was improved by implementing programmatic communication interface and by refining best practices for QI analysis results curation.

Conclusion: Tools, capabilities of the DICOM standard, and datasets we introduced found adoption and utility within the cancer imaging community. A collaborative approach is critical to addressing challenges in imaging informatics at the national and international levels. Numerous challenges remain in establishing and maintaining the infrastructure of analysis tools and standardized datasets for the imaging community. Ideas and technology developed by the QIICR project are contributing to the NCI Imaging Data Commons currently being developed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Andrey Fedorov

Research Funding: Siemens Healthcare (Inst)

Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer

Research Funding: GE Healthcare (Inst)

David Clunie

Leadership: PixelMed

Consulting or Advisory Role: Algotec, BK Medical, Imago, Lunit, MDDX/Bioclinica, Medigate

Expert Testimony: Confidential arbitration

Other Relationship: NEMA (501(c)6 trade association) MITA Division

Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin

Research Funding: Kitware (Inst)

Csaba Pinter

Employment: Pixel Medical

Leadership: Pixel Medical

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Pixel Medical

Honoraria: Medical Augmented Intelligence

Steve Pieper

Employment: Isomics

Leadership: Isomics

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Isomics

Consulting or Advisory Role: Boston Scientific (Inst)

Research Funding: Siemens Healthineers (Inst)

Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I do joint research with Mass General Brigham and jointly file patents (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Siemens Healthineers

Klaus Maier-Hein

Research Funding: Siemens Healthineers

Joel Saltz

Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent pending: computational staining to generate and quantify tumor infiltrating lymphocytes using digitized diagnostic tissue images (Inst)

Fiona Fennessy

Consulting or Advisory Role: Virtualscopics

John Buatti

Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UptoDate

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Download statistics for the 3D Slicer extensions developed with the contribution of the Quantitative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research (QIICR) project. Note that extensions were released at different times, with some extensions being available longer than others. Some of the extensions are dependent on others (eg, PETDICOMExtension can be installed individually, but is also downloaded every time PET-IndiC or QuantitativeReporting is installed). Statistics reported were collected on December 15, 2019, using the script available publicly at https://github.com/Slicer/SlicerDeveloperToolsForExtensions. These reported download counts do not include downloads of the binary packages directly from GitHub or downloads of Docker images from DockerHub (which were used for disseminating dcmqi packages), or downloads of the source code (due to technical limitations of being able to track such downloads).
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Example demonstration of image analysis results interoperability enabled by DICOM. From bottom left corner clockwise, examples of platforms visualizing the same Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) positron emission tomography (PET) segmentation dataset from the public QIN-HEADNECK collection,: 3D Slicer (free, open-source desktop application), OHIF Viewer (free, open-source Web viewer), Brainlab SmartBrush (commercial Food and Drug Administration–approved tumor outlining application). Results were collected as part of the DICOM4QI (DICOM for Quantitative Imaging) demonstration and connectathon organized by Quantitative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research (QIICR) at the annual Radiologic Society of North America meeting since 2015., The histogram shows the significant increase in the The Cancer Imaging Archive–reported usage of the QIN-HEADNECK collection after the publication of the preprint in Nov 2015 (red arrow) and peer-reviewed paper in May 2016 (green arrow), which introduced imaging-related DICOM data (segmentations, measurements, clinical data) to accompany the imaging dataset.

References

    1. Clarke LP, Croft BS, Nordstrom R, et al. Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy. Transl Oncol. 2009;2:195–197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shankar LK. The clinical evaluation of novel imaging methods for cancer management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:738–744. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor JPB, Aboagye EO, Adams JE, et al: Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:169-186, 2016. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke LP, Nordstrom RJ, Zhang H, et al. The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI’s historical perspective and planned goals. Transl Oncol. 2014;7:1–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordstrom RJ. The Quantitative Imaging Network in precision medicine. Tomography. 2016;2:239–241. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types