Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 May;23(5):e25491.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.25491.

Integrating oral PrEP delivery among African women in a large HIV endpoint-driven clinical trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Integrating oral PrEP delivery among African women in a large HIV endpoint-driven clinical trial

Ivana Beesham et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Global guidelines emphasize the ethical obligation of investigators to help participants in HIV-endpoint trials reduce HIV risk by offering an optimal HIV prevention package. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has increasingly become part of state-of-the-art HIV prevention. Here we describe the process of integrating oral PrEP delivery into the HIV prevention package of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial.

Methods: ECHO was an open-label randomized clinical trial that compared HIV incidence among women randomized to one of three effective contraceptives. In total, 7830 women aged 16 to 35 years from 12 sites in four African countries (Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa and Zambia) were enrolled and followed for 12 to 18 months, from 2015 to 2018. Part-way through the course of the trial, oral PrEP was provided to study participants either off-site via referral or on site via trained trial staff. PrEP uptake was compared between different contraceptive users using Chi-squared tests or t-tests. HIV seroincidence rates were compared between participants who never versus ever initiated PrEP using exact Poisson regression.

Results: PrEP access in ECHO began through public availability in Kenya in May 2017 and was available at all sites by June 2018. When PrEP became available, 3626 (46.3%) eligible women were still in follow-up in the study, and of these, 622 (17.2%) initiated PrEP. Women initiating PrEP were slightly older; more likely to be unmarried, not living with their partner, having multiple partners; and less likely to be earning their own income and receiving financial support from partners (all p < 0.05). PrEP initiation did not differ across study randomized groups (p = 0.7). Two-thirds of PrEP users were continuing PrEP at study exit.

Conclusions: There is a need for improved HIV prevention services in clinical trials with HIV endpoints, especially trials among African women. PrEP as a component of a comprehensive HIV prevention package provided to women in a large clinical trial is practical and feasible. Provision of PrEP within clinical trials with HIV outcomes should be standard of prevention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02550067.

Keywords: HIV; clinical trials; pre-exposure prophylaxis; standard of care; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PrEP eligibility and initiation in the ECHO Trial. **Of the 643 women who were not eligible, 128 had less than 28 days of follow up at sites that were providing PrEP on‐site and 515 were either pregnant (26) or breastfeeding (489) at all follow up visits when PrEP was available (in sites other than Kenya and Eswatini). PrEP access was defined as beginning in May 2017 for the site in Kenya, in November 2017 for the site in Zambia, in December 2017 for the site in Eswatini, and between March 2018 and June 2018 for the nine sites in South Africa. ECHO, Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes; PrEP, pre‐exposure prophylaxis.

References

    1. UNAIDS, WHO . Ethical considerations in biomedical HIV prevention trials: guidance document [Additional guidance point added in 2012]. 2012. [cited Sep 2 2019]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2012/20120701_jc1399_ethic...
    1. UNAIDS, AIDS. Vaccine Advocacy Coalition . Good participatory practice: guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials 2011 [cited Sep 2 2019]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2011/20110629_JC1853_GPP_G...
    1. Haire B, Folayan MO, Hankins C, Sugarman J, Mccormack S, Ramjee G, et al. Ethical considerations in determining standard of prevention packages for HIV prevention trials: examining PrEP. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13(2):87–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. HIV Prevention HIV Prevention Trials Network . Ethics guidance for research. 2009. [cited Feb 20 2020]. Available from: https://www.hptn.org/sites/default/files/2016-05/HPTNEthicsGuidanceV10Ju...
    1. WHO . Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre‐exposure prophylaxis for HIV. 2015. [cited July 5 2019]. Available from: https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/earlyrelease-arv/en/ - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources