Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 9;9(5):364.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens9050364.

Correlation between Milk Bacteriology, Cytology and Mammary Tissue Histology in Cows: Cure from the Pathogen or Recovery from the Inflammation

Affiliations

Correlation between Milk Bacteriology, Cytology and Mammary Tissue Histology in Cows: Cure from the Pathogen or Recovery from the Inflammation

Gabriel Leitner et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to verify the existence of a significant correlation between bacterial isolation (or not) and mammary gland inflammation, using traditional bacterial culturing and PCR, milk leucocytes distributions, and tissue histology. Twenty-two cows were tested at the level of the individual gland for bacteriological culture and real-time PCR (RT-PCR), milk composition, somatic cells count (SCC), and cell differentiation. Post-slaughter samples of teat-ends and mammary tissues were tested for histology and bacteriology by RT-PCR. The 88 glands were assigned to either outcome: 1. Healthy-no inflammation and no bacterial finding (NBF) (n = 33); 2. Inflammation and NBF (n = 26); 3. Inflammation and intra-mammary infection (n = 22) with different bacteria. Bacteriology of milk samples and that of the RT-PCR showed 91.4% agreement. In the lobule's tissues of healthy glands, ~50% were milk producers and the other glands had dry areas with increased fat globules with a low number of leukocytes. In contrast, ~75% of the infected glands were identified as inflamed, but with no isolation of bacteria. Infiltration of mononuclear cells and neutrophils into the connective tissue was observed but not in the lobule's lumen. In summary, the study confirms that not every mastitis/inflammation is also an infection.

Keywords: PCR; cow; intermammary infection; mastitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Microscope photographs: (A) Teat-end; (B) Lobule’s tissues of healthy glands of milk-producing cows; (C) Lobule’s tissues of healthy glands with non-milk producing areas and increased fat globules, with only a low number of leukocytes; (D,E) Lobule’s tissues of glands identified as inflamed but with no bacteria isolation, infiltration of mononuclear cells and neutrophils into the connective tissue, but not in the lobules lumen; (F) lobule’s tissues with high numbers of neutrophils.

References

    1. Auldist M.J., Coats S., Sutherland B.J., Mayes J.J., McDowell G.H. Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on raw milk composition and the yield and quality of Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Res. 1996;63:269–280. doi: 10.1017/S0022029900031769. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaeggi J.J., Govindasamy-Lucey S., Berger Y.M., Johnson M.E., McKusick B.C., Thomas D.L., Wendorff W.L. Hard ewe’s milk cheese manufactured from milk of three different groups of somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 2003;86:3082–3089. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73908-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leitner G., Chaffer M., Shamay A., Shapiro F., Merin U., Ezra E., Saran A., Silanikove N. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 2004;87:46–52. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73140-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leitner G., Merin U., Silanikove N. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in goats. J. Dairy Sci. 2004;87:1719–1726. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73325-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leitner G., Merin U., Silanikove N. Effects of glandular bacterial infection and stage of lactation on milk quality: Comparison among cows, goats and sheep. Int. Dairy J. 2011;21:279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.11.013. - DOI