Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 May 18;9(10):e014883.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014883. Epub 2020 May 13.

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the California Teachers Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the California Teachers Study

Lorena S Pacheco et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption has been associated with cardiometabolic risk. However, the association between total and type of SSB intake and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) end points such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization is limited. Methods and Results We examined the prospective association of baseline SSB consumption with incident CVD in 106 178 women free from CVD and diabetes mellitus in the CTS (California Teachers Study), a cohort of female teachers and administrators, followed since 1995. SSBs were defined as caloric soft drinks, sweetened bottled waters or teas, and fruit drinks, and derived from a self-administered food frequency questionnaire. CVD end points were based on annual linkage with statewide inpatient hospitalization records. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between SSB consumption and incident CVD. A total of 8848 CVD incident cases were documented over 20 years of follow-up. After adjusting for potential confounders, we observed higher hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.34), revascularization (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.54]), and stroke (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.41) in women who consumed ≥1 serving per day of SSBs compared with rare/never consumers. We also observed a higher risk of CVD in women who consumed ≥1 serving per day of fruit drinks (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.00-2.01 [P trend=0.021]) and caloric soft drinks (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05-1.44 [P trend=0.0002]), compared with rare/never consumers. Conclusions Consuming ≥1 serving per day of SSB was associated with CVD, revascularization, and stroke. SSB intake might be a modifiable dietary target to reduce risk of CVD among women.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; nutritional epidemiology; observational study; sugar‐sweetened beverages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart showing enrollment, exclusions, and final analytic sample for sugar‐sweetened beverage consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in the CTS (California Teachers Study).
CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Association of specific sugar‐sweetened beverage consumption and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Hazard ratios comparing ≥1 sugar‐sweetened beverage serving per day vs rare/never (reference) categories. Multivariable‐adjusted model adjusted age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, smoking status, alcohol intake, CVD family history, physical activity, aspirin use, menopausal status, menopausal hormone therapy use, history of hypertension, body mass index, total energy intake, and consumption of sugar‐sweetened bottled waters or teas, fruit drinks, and caloric soft drinks (other than the main exposure, depending on model). P for trend statistical significance at P<0.05. P for trend statistical significance at P<0.001.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture . 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2015. Available at: http://health.gov/dieta​rygui​delin​es/2015/guide​lines/. Accessed February 7, 2019.
    1. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard BV, Lefevre M, Lustig RH, Sacks F, Steffen LM, Wylie‐Rosett J. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health. Circulation. 2009;120:1011–1020. - PubMed
    1. Powell ES, Smith‐Taillie LP, Popkin BM. added sugars intake across the distribution of US children and adult consumers: 1977–2012. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116:1543–1550.e1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: Switzerland; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Lloyd‐Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, Greenlund K, Daniels S, Nichol G, Tomaselli GF, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's Strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121:586–613. - PubMed

Publication types