Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;273(3):467-473.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915.

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews

Hala Muaddi  1 , Melanie El Hafid  1 , Woo Jin Choi  1 , Erin Lillie  2 , Charles de Mestral  3   4   5 , Avery Nathens  1   6   3   5 , Therese A Stukel  3   5 , Paul J Karanicolas  1   2   6   3
Affiliations

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews

Hala Muaddi et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: Describe clinical outcomes (eg, postoperative complications, survival) after robotic surgery compared to open or laparoscopic surgery.

Background: Robotic surgery utilization has increased over the years across a wide range of surgical procedures. However, evidence supporting improved clinical outcomes after robotic surgery is limited.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of systematic reviews from inception to January 2019 for systematic reviews describing postoperative outcomes after robotic surgery. We qualitatively described patient outcomes of commonly performed robotic procedures: radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, lobectomy, thymectomy, rectal resection, partial nephrectomy, distal gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, hepatectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and cholecystectomy.

Results: One hundred fifty-four systematic reviews included 336 studies and 18 randomized controlled trials reporting on patient outcomes after robotic compared to laparoscopic or open procedures. Data from the randomized controlled trials demonstrate that robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy offered fewer biochemical recurrence and improvement in quality of recovery and pain scores only up to 6 weeks postoperatively compared to open radical prostatectomy. When compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy, robotic surgery offered improved urinary and sexual functions. Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer had fewer conversion to open compared to laparoscopic. Otherwise, robotic surgery outcomes were similar to conventional surgical approaches for other procedures except for radical hysterectomy where minimally invasive approaches may result in patient harm compared to open approach.

Conclusion: Robotic surgery has been widely incorporated into practise despite limited supporting evidence. More rigorous research focused on patient-important benefits is needed before further expansion of robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Kelley WE. The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2008; 12:351–357.
    1. Carr BM, Lyon JA, Romeiser J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review evaluating Cochrane systematic reviews. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:1693–1709.
    1. Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinée S, et al. Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:879–897.
    1. Pino C, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Outcomes in registered, ongoing randomized controlled trials of patient education. PLoS One 2012; 7:e42934.
    1. Marohn MR, Hanly EJ. Twenty-first century surgery using twenty-first century technology: surgical robotics. Curr Surg 2004; 61:466–473.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources