An Update on Regional Nodal Irradiation: Indication, Target Volume Delineation, and Radiotherapy Techniques

Abstract

Background: Tremendous changes have occurred in the treatment of breast cancer. This paper reviews and unifies the available data on modern axillary management of breast cancer patients with focus on the target volume delineation for regional nodal irradiation according to the most important contouring guidelines, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG).

Summary: The use of extensive radiotherapy target volumes (level I, II, III, IV) is probably not necessary for all patients to reproduce the clinical benefit shown in the available randomized trials (EORTC, MA.20, AMAROS, Z0011). Nevertheless, given the results in the MA.20 trial, where the patients received more modern systemic therapies and high irradiation doses in the medial paraclavicular region (level IV) and level II, it can be justified to include these regions completely in selected high-risk patients.

Key messages: High-tangent irradiation results in a similar dose distribution in axillary levels I and II compared to the AMAROS treatment field design in some patients. This supports earlier assumptions that irradiation may have accounted for the good results after sentinel lymph node dissection alone in the Z0011 trial. The ESTRO and RTOG clinical target volume (CTV) definitions cover sufficiently the metastatic lymph node hotspots, with a better coverage for the ESTRO CTV. Further, contouring according to the ESTRO would spare a significantly larger part of the healthy lymphatic system, making it our preferred contouring atlas. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as deep inspiration breath hold, should be cautiously employed in patients treated according to the inclusion criteria of the Z0011 as it will result in a lower dose to the axillary levels.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Lymphatics; Radiotherapy; Regional nodal irradiation.

Fig. 1

RTOG and ESTRO contouring recommendations.

Fig. 2

3D atlas of location of healthy lymph nodes.

Fig. 3

3D atlas of pathological lymph nodes.